Improving clustering-based and adaptive position-aware interpolation oversampling for imbalanced data classification

Class imbalance is one of the most significant difficulties in modern machine learning. This is because of the inherent bias of standard classifiers toward favoring majority instances while often ignoring minority instances. Interpolation-based oversampling techniques are among the most popular solu...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY-COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
Main Authors: Wang, Yujiang; Rosli, Marshima Mohd; Musa, Norzilah; Wang, Lei
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: SPRINGERNATURE 2024
主題:
在線閱讀:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001410486900001
實物特徵
總結:Class imbalance is one of the most significant difficulties in modern machine learning. This is because of the inherent bias of standard classifiers toward favoring majority instances while often ignoring minority instances. Interpolation-based oversampling techniques are among the most popular solutions for generating synthetic minority samples to correct imbalanced class distributions. However, synthetic minority samples have a risk of overlapping with the majority-class samples. Inappropriate interpolation of minority samples during oversampling can also result in over generalization. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose a Clustering- based and Adaptive Position-aware Interpolation Oversampling algorithm (CAPAIO) for imbalanced binary dataset classification. CAPAIO initially employs an improved density-based clustering algorithm to group minority instances into inland, borderline, and trapped samples. It then adaptively determines the size of each subcluster and allocates weights to minority samples, guiding the synthesis of minority samples based on these weights. Finally, distinct interpolation oversampling algorithms are individually performed on these three categories of minority samples. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed CAPAIO inmost datasets compared with eleven other oversampling algorithms.
ISSN:1319-1578
2213-1248
DOI:10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102253