Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models

Covalent organic framework-1 (COF-1) has been synthesized and its textural characteristics determined via surface analyzer and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) analysis has also been conducted to determine the types of covalent bonding present in the material. O...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Materials Chemistry and Physics
المؤلف الرئيسي: 2-s2.0-77953132939
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:English
منشور في: 2010
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77953132939&doi=10.1016%2fj.matchemphys.2010.04.009&partnerID=40&md5=1270a717047888759096d9ef8a266bd2
id Musa M.A.A.; Yin C.-Y.; Savory R.M.
spelling Musa M.A.A.; Yin C.-Y.; Savory R.M.
2-s2.0-77953132939
Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
2010
Materials Chemistry and Physics
123
1
10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.009
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77953132939&doi=10.1016%2fj.matchemphys.2010.04.009&partnerID=40&md5=1270a717047888759096d9ef8a266bd2
Covalent organic framework-1 (COF-1) has been synthesized and its textural characteristics determined via surface analyzer and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) analysis has also been conducted to determine the types of covalent bonding present in the material. Our customized synthesis procedure yields a COF-1 powder consisting of granular-shaped bulk particles with approximate diameters ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 μm. Results comparison of three established and commonly-used pore size distribution models, namely, Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH), Horvath-Kawazoe (HK) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) reveals that the DFT model is the most appropriate model for COF-1 due to limitation of porosity range of the other two models. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

2540584
English
Article

author 2-s2.0-77953132939
spellingShingle 2-s2.0-77953132939
Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
author_facet 2-s2.0-77953132939
author_sort 2-s2.0-77953132939
title Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
title_short Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
title_full Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
title_fullStr Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
title_full_unstemmed Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
title_sort Synthesis and textural characterization of covalent organic framework-1: Comparison of pore size distribution models
publishDate 2010
container_title Materials Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 123
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.009
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77953132939&doi=10.1016%2fj.matchemphys.2010.04.009&partnerID=40&md5=1270a717047888759096d9ef8a266bd2
description Covalent organic framework-1 (COF-1) has been synthesized and its textural characteristics determined via surface analyzer and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) analysis has also been conducted to determine the types of covalent bonding present in the material. Our customized synthesis procedure yields a COF-1 powder consisting of granular-shaped bulk particles with approximate diameters ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 μm. Results comparison of three established and commonly-used pore size distribution models, namely, Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH), Horvath-Kawazoe (HK) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) reveals that the DFT model is the most appropriate model for COF-1 due to limitation of porosity range of the other two models. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
publisher
issn 2540584
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1828987884351258624