Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
The aims of this study are to estimate the equivalent dose to the skin, eyes and thyroid in intra-and extra-oral imaging examination and to compare the dose-area product (DAP) derived from the calculation method with Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) that has been provided by the Malaysian Ministry...
发表在: | Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology |
---|---|
主要作者: | |
格式: | 文件 |
语言: | English |
出版: |
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
2017
|
在线阅读: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049149575&partnerID=40&md5=ac2716fb8b3202f235e78d5b7c88f674 |
id |
Mohamed N.C.; Nawawi H.; Yusof M.Y.P.M.; Siong K.K. |
---|---|
spelling |
Mohamed N.C.; Nawawi H.; Yusof M.Y.P.M.; Siong K.K. 2-s2.0-85049149575 Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations 2017 Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology 25 S7 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049149575&partnerID=40&md5=ac2716fb8b3202f235e78d5b7c88f674 The aims of this study are to estimate the equivalent dose to the skin, eyes and thyroid in intra-and extra-oral imaging examination and to compare the dose-area product (DAP) derived from the calculation method with Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) that has been provided by the Malaysian Ministry of Health (MOH). Dose equivalent is measured by placing Thermoluminescence Dosimeter (TLD-100H) in the anthropomorphic RANDO phantom. Exposure is performed using intra-oral X-ray machine ActeonSatelec X-Mind® and extra-oral X-ray machine InstrumentariumOP300®, and the value is compared to the equivalent dose of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) dose limit. DAP value for both examinations was obtained by using formula and comparing them with the DRL from MOH. The average dose equivalent of intra-and extra-oral radiographic examination is lower than the ICRP dose limit. The doses derived from both examinations did not exceed the prescribed levels when compared with DRL. The doses calculated for intra-oral examination of molar maxillary, molar mandibular and interproximal (bitewing) was 0.880 mGy while periapical examination of the anterior maxillary and mandibular was 0.688 mGy and occlusal examination was 1.100 mGy. For the panoramic examination the dose was 0.011 mGy.m2 while lateral cephalometric examination was 0.0054 mGy.m2. The doses obtained from this study were within the dose limit and predetermined level. This shows that a patient receives the minimum dose for both dental radiographic examinations with the optimum level of safety which meets the ALARA concept. © 2017 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 1287680 English Article |
author |
2-s2.0-85049149575 |
spellingShingle |
2-s2.0-85049149575 Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations |
author_facet |
2-s2.0-85049149575 |
author_sort |
2-s2.0-85049149575 |
title |
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations |
title_short |
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations |
title_full |
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations |
title_fullStr |
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations |
title_sort |
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations |
publishDate |
2017 |
container_title |
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology |
container_volume |
25 |
container_issue |
S7 |
doi_str_mv |
|
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049149575&partnerID=40&md5=ac2716fb8b3202f235e78d5b7c88f674 |
description |
The aims of this study are to estimate the equivalent dose to the skin, eyes and thyroid in intra-and extra-oral imaging examination and to compare the dose-area product (DAP) derived from the calculation method with Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) that has been provided by the Malaysian Ministry of Health (MOH). Dose equivalent is measured by placing Thermoluminescence Dosimeter (TLD-100H) in the anthropomorphic RANDO phantom. Exposure is performed using intra-oral X-ray machine ActeonSatelec X-Mind® and extra-oral X-ray machine InstrumentariumOP300®, and the value is compared to the equivalent dose of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) dose limit. DAP value for both examinations was obtained by using formula and comparing them with the DRL from MOH. The average dose equivalent of intra-and extra-oral radiographic examination is lower than the ICRP dose limit. The doses derived from both examinations did not exceed the prescribed levels when compared with DRL. The doses calculated for intra-oral examination of molar maxillary, molar mandibular and interproximal (bitewing) was 0.880 mGy while periapical examination of the anterior maxillary and mandibular was 0.688 mGy and occlusal examination was 1.100 mGy. For the panoramic examination the dose was 0.011 mGy.m2 while lateral cephalometric examination was 0.0054 mGy.m2. The doses obtained from this study were within the dose limit and predetermined level. This shows that a patient receives the minimum dose for both dental radiographic examinations with the optimum level of safety which meets the ALARA concept. © 2017 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. |
publisher |
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press |
issn |
1287680 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1828987879620083712 |