Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading

A three-story single-unit tunnel form building (TFB) was designed using a non-seismic code of practice (BS 8110). Two one-third scale test models were constructed and tested under in-plane lateral cyclic loading and out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading, respectively. The specimens were tested at ±0.0...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences
Main Author: 2-s2.0-85051624618
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute for Research and Community Services, Institut Teknologi Bandung 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85051624618&doi=10.5614%2f2Fj.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.2.5&partnerID=40&md5=8f6cc57123f2fdc01a409a7bb73eb67d
id Hamid N.H.A.; Anuar S.; Awang H.; Effendi M.K.
spelling Hamid N.H.A.; Anuar S.; Awang H.; Effendi M.K.
2-s2.0-85051624618
Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
2018
Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences
50
2
10.5614/2Fj.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.2.5
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85051624618&doi=10.5614%2f2Fj.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.2.5&partnerID=40&md5=8f6cc57123f2fdc01a409a7bb73eb67d
A three-story single-unit tunnel form building (TFB) was designed using a non-seismic code of practice (BS 8110). Two one-third scale test models were constructed and tested under in-plane lateral cyclic loading and out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading, respectively. The specimens were tested at ±0.01%, ±0.1%, ±0.25%, ±0.5%, ±0.75%, ±1.0%, ±1.25%, ±1.5%, ±1.75% ±1.8, ±1.9% and ±2% drifts, after which severe cracks were observed on the wall-slab joints and wall panels. Subsequently, the damaged specimens were repaired and retrofitted by wrapping carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) around the damaged walls and affixing steel plates and steel angles at the wall-slab joints using several different repair and retrofitting schemes. The repaired specimens were retested using the same drifts. The comparison of the seismic behavior between unrepaired and repaired specimens was made based on visual observation of damage, hysteresis loops, lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility, and equivalent viscous damping. The experimental results showed that the repaired specimens were improved in terms of damage, lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility, and equivalent viscous damping. It is recommended to strengthen and rehabilitate tunnel form buildings after an earthquake using CFRP, additional shear walls, steel plates and steel angles. ©2018 Published by ITB Journal Publisher.
Institute for Research and Community Services, Institut Teknologi Bandung
23375779
English
Article

author 2-s2.0-85051624618
spellingShingle 2-s2.0-85051624618
Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
author_facet 2-s2.0-85051624618
author_sort 2-s2.0-85051624618
title Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
title_short Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
title_full Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
title_fullStr Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
title_full_unstemmed Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
title_sort Seismic behavior of tunnel form building under lateral cyclic loading
publishDate 2018
container_title Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences
container_volume 50
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv 10.5614/2Fj.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.2.5
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85051624618&doi=10.5614%2f2Fj.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.2.5&partnerID=40&md5=8f6cc57123f2fdc01a409a7bb73eb67d
description A three-story single-unit tunnel form building (TFB) was designed using a non-seismic code of practice (BS 8110). Two one-third scale test models were constructed and tested under in-plane lateral cyclic loading and out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading, respectively. The specimens were tested at ±0.01%, ±0.1%, ±0.25%, ±0.5%, ±0.75%, ±1.0%, ±1.25%, ±1.5%, ±1.75% ±1.8, ±1.9% and ±2% drifts, after which severe cracks were observed on the wall-slab joints and wall panels. Subsequently, the damaged specimens were repaired and retrofitted by wrapping carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) around the damaged walls and affixing steel plates and steel angles at the wall-slab joints using several different repair and retrofitting schemes. The repaired specimens were retested using the same drifts. The comparison of the seismic behavior between unrepaired and repaired specimens was made based on visual observation of damage, hysteresis loops, lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility, and equivalent viscous damping. The experimental results showed that the repaired specimens were improved in terms of damage, lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility, and equivalent viscous damping. It is recommended to strengthen and rehabilitate tunnel form buildings after an earthquake using CFRP, additional shear walls, steel plates and steel angles. ©2018 Published by ITB Journal Publisher.
publisher Institute for Research and Community Services, Institut Teknologi Bandung
issn 23375779
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1828987878982549504