| 總結: | The interpretation of naṢ mutashābihāt, whether from the Qur’an or the Hadith, as well as their comprehension, must adhere to the methodologies outlined by reputable scholars. This is deemed crucial to ensure that the understanding derived from such texts aligns with the teachings of Prophet Muhammad, particularly in the context of creed and belief. However, there exists a group of individuals who reject the methodologies established by these scholars, despite the fact that one of the foundational principles of their approach to understanding nas mutashabihat is the acknowledgment of the concept of majāz (metaphor) and the rejection of literalism. This is because the denial of majāz concerning nas mutashabihat and a literal interpretation of such texts often lead to misunderstandings of the intended meanings of the naṢ. Hence, this study aims to examine and analyze the implications of literalism and the rejection of the concept of majāz on naṢ mutashābihāt from the perspective of al-Ashā‘irah. This is a library-based study that employs descriptive analysis of the texts of esteemed scholars in the fields of exegesis and theology concerning nas mutashabihat. The study finds that literalism in engaging with naṢ mutashābihāt and the denial of the concept of majāz in the Qur’an and Hadith result in the crimes of anthropomorphism (tajsim) and assimilation (tashbih) among those who associate themselves with Islam, ultimately equating Allah Ta’ala with His creation under the guise of interpretation and religion. © 2024 Centre of Quranic Research (CQR), University of Malaya, Malaysia.
|
|---|