EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Confidence-based assessment (CBA) is a technique designed to evaluate an individual’s degree of confidence or expectation regarding their response to discern their true level of knowledge. In this methodology, individuals assign confidence scores to their answers, indicating their level of certainty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
Main Author: Nor Azharludin N.M.; Abu Samah K.A.F.; Bin Dzulkalnine M.F.; Hamzah R.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Little Lion Scientific 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212872518&partnerID=40&md5=2aa592fc15169bd978dc81cd1112ead5
id 2-s2.0-85212872518
spelling 2-s2.0-85212872518
Nor Azharludin N.M.; Abu Samah K.A.F.; Bin Dzulkalnine M.F.; Hamzah R.
EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
2024
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
102
23

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212872518&partnerID=40&md5=2aa592fc15169bd978dc81cd1112ead5
Confidence-based assessment (CBA) is a technique designed to evaluate an individual’s degree of confidence or expectation regarding their response to discern their true level of knowledge. In this methodology, individuals assign confidence scores to their answers, indicating their level of certainty about the correctness of their choices. This approach enhances understanding an individual’s abilities or comprehension by distinguishing between correct responses with high confidence and those with low confidence. Consequently, evaluators gain a more comprehensive understanding of an individual’s competence by examining their cognitive processes and self-awareness. Despite its potential, there is a lack of systematic reviews focusing on enhancing CBA. This study addresses this gap by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) on improving CBA methodologies. The present study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, systematically analysing 11 articles published between 2019 and 2024. These articles were selected from three primary databases—Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect—and one supplementary database, Google Scholar. The review of these studies identified four major themes: sector, purpose, algorithm, and methods used. The findings of this SLR provide valuable insights into the current state of CBA research and suggest directions for future studies. In conclusion, this research offers significant benefits for scholars in the CBA field, providing a reference for enhancing the application and understanding of CBA. © Little Lion Scientific.
Little Lion Scientific
19928645
English
Review

author Nor Azharludin N.M.; Abu Samah K.A.F.; Bin Dzulkalnine M.F.; Hamzah R.
spellingShingle Nor Azharludin N.M.; Abu Samah K.A.F.; Bin Dzulkalnine M.F.; Hamzah R.
EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
author_facet Nor Azharludin N.M.; Abu Samah K.A.F.; Bin Dzulkalnine M.F.; Hamzah R.
author_sort Nor Azharludin N.M.; Abu Samah K.A.F.; Bin Dzulkalnine M.F.; Hamzah R.
title EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
title_short EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
title_full EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
title_fullStr EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
title_sort EXPLORING ENHANCEMENT IN CONFIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
container_volume 102
container_issue 23
doi_str_mv
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212872518&partnerID=40&md5=2aa592fc15169bd978dc81cd1112ead5
description Confidence-based assessment (CBA) is a technique designed to evaluate an individual’s degree of confidence or expectation regarding their response to discern their true level of knowledge. In this methodology, individuals assign confidence scores to their answers, indicating their level of certainty about the correctness of their choices. This approach enhances understanding an individual’s abilities or comprehension by distinguishing between correct responses with high confidence and those with low confidence. Consequently, evaluators gain a more comprehensive understanding of an individual’s competence by examining their cognitive processes and self-awareness. Despite its potential, there is a lack of systematic reviews focusing on enhancing CBA. This study addresses this gap by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) on improving CBA methodologies. The present study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, systematically analysing 11 articles published between 2019 and 2024. These articles were selected from three primary databases—Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect—and one supplementary database, Google Scholar. The review of these studies identified four major themes: sector, purpose, algorithm, and methods used. The findings of this SLR provide valuable insights into the current state of CBA research and suggest directions for future studies. In conclusion, this research offers significant benefits for scholars in the CBA field, providing a reference for enhancing the application and understanding of CBA. © Little Lion Scientific.
publisher Little Lion Scientific
issn 19928645
language English
format Review
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1820775428993843200