Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students

This study proposes experiential learning methods for delivering and assessing substantive law courses to undergraduate students. The study reviews current experiential learning methods used to teach contract law, the most common substantive law course offered to law and non-law undergraduate studen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asian Journal of Legal Education
Main Author: Mahmood A.; Hashim H.N.M.; Zakuan Z.Z.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications Inc. 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163856929&doi=10.1177%2f23220058231175984&partnerID=40&md5=0efb046f6eb989cdfc3b6194334ff533
id 2-s2.0-85163856929
spelling 2-s2.0-85163856929
Mahmood A.; Hashim H.N.M.; Zakuan Z.Z.A.
Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
2024
Asian Journal of Legal Education
11
1
10.1177/23220058231175984
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163856929&doi=10.1177%2f23220058231175984&partnerID=40&md5=0efb046f6eb989cdfc3b6194334ff533
This study proposes experiential learning methods for delivering and assessing substantive law courses to undergraduate students. The study reviews current experiential learning methods used to teach contract law, the most common substantive law course offered to law and non-law undergraduate students. The identified methods are synthesized and mapped to Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle. The study follows the PRISMA-ScR checklist and explanation guidelines to report its findings. A scholarly search was conducted on Google Scholar and four online databases (ACM Digital Library, EMERALD, PROQUEST and SCOPUS). Of the 44 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 141 essential original constructs were collected, and 7 methods were derived. The study found that role-plays and simulation methods recorded the highest percentage of original constructs (38%, n = 54), followed by fieldwork and clinical methods (26%, n = 36), case-based methods (11%, n = 15), writing task methods (9%, n = 12), problem-based learning methods (7%, n = 11), street law (5%, n = 7) and seminar-based methods (4%, n = 6). The study also synthesized 23 new items for experiential learning methods that may guide the teaching of substantive law courses to undergraduate students. This scoping review adds significant value to the current body of knowledge by presenting novel items that law academics can use to adopt experiential learning methods for teaching substantive law to undergraduate students. These items can also be adapted for the development of experiential-based learning course syllabi and assessments for other substantive law courses not included as a sample of analysis. © 2023 The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences.
SAGE Publications Inc.
23220058
English
Article

author Mahmood A.; Hashim H.N.M.; Zakuan Z.Z.A.
spellingShingle Mahmood A.; Hashim H.N.M.; Zakuan Z.Z.A.
Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
author_facet Mahmood A.; Hashim H.N.M.; Zakuan Z.Z.A.
author_sort Mahmood A.; Hashim H.N.M.; Zakuan Z.Z.A.
title Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
title_short Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
title_full Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
title_fullStr Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
title_sort Utilizing Experiential Learning Methods to Teach Substantive Law Courses to Undergraduate Students
publishDate 2024
container_title Asian Journal of Legal Education
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1177/23220058231175984
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163856929&doi=10.1177%2f23220058231175984&partnerID=40&md5=0efb046f6eb989cdfc3b6194334ff533
description This study proposes experiential learning methods for delivering and assessing substantive law courses to undergraduate students. The study reviews current experiential learning methods used to teach contract law, the most common substantive law course offered to law and non-law undergraduate students. The identified methods are synthesized and mapped to Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle. The study follows the PRISMA-ScR checklist and explanation guidelines to report its findings. A scholarly search was conducted on Google Scholar and four online databases (ACM Digital Library, EMERALD, PROQUEST and SCOPUS). Of the 44 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 141 essential original constructs were collected, and 7 methods were derived. The study found that role-plays and simulation methods recorded the highest percentage of original constructs (38%, n = 54), followed by fieldwork and clinical methods (26%, n = 36), case-based methods (11%, n = 15), writing task methods (9%, n = 12), problem-based learning methods (7%, n = 11), street law (5%, n = 7) and seminar-based methods (4%, n = 6). The study also synthesized 23 new items for experiential learning methods that may guide the teaching of substantive law courses to undergraduate students. This scoping review adds significant value to the current body of knowledge by presenting novel items that law academics can use to adopt experiential learning methods for teaching substantive law to undergraduate students. These items can also be adapted for the development of experiential-based learning course syllabi and assessments for other substantive law courses not included as a sample of analysis. © 2023 The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences.
publisher SAGE Publications Inc.
issn 23220058
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677577231532032