Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions

Building information modelling (BIM) adopters require well-documented, quantitative, and financial simulation studies as solid evidence for the benefits of BIM to implement it and evaluate its success. However, to move towards more practical analyses to be performed by the end-users, more discussion...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Main Authors: Mohamed, Hanan-Allah; Yusuwan, Norazian Mohamad; Hashim, Norfashiha; Usman, Nuruddeen
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: UNIV TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA 2023
主題:
在線閱讀:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001108645300003
author Mohamed
Hanan-Allah; Yusuwan
Norazian Mohamad; Hashim
Norfashiha; Usman
Nuruddeen
spellingShingle Mohamed
Hanan-Allah; Yusuwan
Norazian Mohamad; Hashim
Norfashiha; Usman
Nuruddeen
Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
Construction & Building Technology
author_facet Mohamed
Hanan-Allah; Yusuwan
Norazian Mohamad; Hashim
Norfashiha; Usman
Nuruddeen
author_sort Mohamed
spelling Mohamed, Hanan-Allah; Yusuwan, Norazian Mohamad; Hashim, Norfashiha; Usman, Nuruddeen
Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
English
Article
Building information modelling (BIM) adopters require well-documented, quantitative, and financial simulation studies as solid evidence for the benefits of BIM to implement it and evaluate its success. However, to move towards more practical analyses to be performed by the end-users, more discussions on process to measure BIM benefit should be held, despite the large number of studies related to BIM benefit indicators. Therefore, this study examines the proposed and simulated methods used to measure the benefits of BIM in previous studies. A systematic literature review (SLR) of 21 articles was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and analysed using meta-ethnography and thematic qualitative analysis. The SLR depicted the trends of studies published over the years. The results indicate that out of the 31 BIM benefits identified, only 17 BIM benefits have been measured in simulations. 4 other BIM benefits were suggested to be explored in line with their magnitude of importance. Comparative case studies were used conventionally to collect the data for measuring these benefits. This has since shifted to conducting case studies of single BIM projects along with supplementary data collection for counterfactual assessment. Furthermore, predictive ex-ante studies are currently blooming. At present, ongoing studies are being conducted to demonstrate the detailed technique with which to calculate and measure the benefits of BIM. This paper provides researchers and analysts with initial insights that can be used to move forward with BIM benefit measurements.
UNIV TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
2180-3242

2023
14
5
10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.016
Construction & Building Technology
gold
WOS:001108645300003
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001108645300003
title Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
title_short Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
title_full Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
title_fullStr Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
title_sort Measuring the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
container_title INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
language English
format Article
description Building information modelling (BIM) adopters require well-documented, quantitative, and financial simulation studies as solid evidence for the benefits of BIM to implement it and evaluate its success. However, to move towards more practical analyses to be performed by the end-users, more discussions on process to measure BIM benefit should be held, despite the large number of studies related to BIM benefit indicators. Therefore, this study examines the proposed and simulated methods used to measure the benefits of BIM in previous studies. A systematic literature review (SLR) of 21 articles was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and analysed using meta-ethnography and thematic qualitative analysis. The SLR depicted the trends of studies published over the years. The results indicate that out of the 31 BIM benefits identified, only 17 BIM benefits have been measured in simulations. 4 other BIM benefits were suggested to be explored in line with their magnitude of importance. Comparative case studies were used conventionally to collect the data for measuring these benefits. This has since shifted to conducting case studies of single BIM projects along with supplementary data collection for counterfactual assessment. Furthermore, predictive ex-ante studies are currently blooming. At present, ongoing studies are being conducted to demonstrate the detailed technique with which to calculate and measure the benefits of BIM. This paper provides researchers and analysts with initial insights that can be used to move forward with BIM benefit measurements.
publisher UNIV TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
issn 2180-3242

publishDate 2023
container_volume 14
container_issue 5
doi_str_mv 10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.016
topic Construction & Building Technology
topic_facet Construction & Building Technology
accesstype gold
id WOS:001108645300003
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001108645300003
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1791586756139679744