Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model

Accurate prediction of low-occurrence wind speeds around urban structures is crucial for safe building design. Although Large-eddy simulation (LES) is commonly used as a high-fidelity model as compared with the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, the present validation process relies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Main Authors: Tong, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Mohamad, M. F.; Okaze, T.; Ikegaya, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001338853700001
author Tong
T.; Li
Y.; Wang
W.; Mohamad
M. F.; Okaze
T.; Ikegaya, N.
spellingShingle Tong
T.; Li
Y.; Wang
W.; Mohamad
M. F.; Okaze
T.; Ikegaya, N.
Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
author_facet Tong
T.; Li
Y.; Wang
W.; Mohamad
M. F.; Okaze
T.; Ikegaya, N.
author_sort Tong
spelling Tong, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Mohamad, M. F.; Okaze, T.; Ikegaya, N.
Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
English
Article
Accurate prediction of low-occurrence wind speeds around urban structures is crucial for safe building design. Although Large-eddy simulation (LES) is commonly used as a high-fidelity model as compared with the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, the present validation process relies on the comparison of fundamental statistics of the mean and standard deviations. The discrepancies in LESs and wind-tunnel experiments (WTEs) are unclear in terms of physical quantities characterizing the unsteadiness of the simulated turbulent flow such as probability density and power spectral densities, and low-occurrence winds speeds. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LES in predicting unsteady wind behavior around a 1:1:2 block model. The study identifies prominent differences to improve the accuracy of unsteady numerical simulations especially for the purpose of predicting low-occurrence wind speeds. Various advection schemes in LESs were investigated, including first-order upwind, second-order linear, and dynamic interpolation schemes. The results show significant discrepancies, particularly in higher-order statistics and low-occurrence wind speeds, with WTE consistently exhibiting higher energy levels across all frequencies. These findings highlight the need to refine advection schemes to enhance their predictive accuracy. LESs with minimal numerical errors from discretization schemes can substantially improve urban wind assessments and contribute to the design of safer structures.
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
0360-1323
1873-684X
2025
267

10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112201
Construction & Building Technology; Engineering

WOS:001338853700001
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001338853700001
title Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
title_short Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
title_full Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
title_fullStr Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
title_sort Comparisons of experimentally and numerically determined statistics for predicting low-occurrence wind speeds around a 1:1:2 block model
container_title BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
language English
format Article
description Accurate prediction of low-occurrence wind speeds around urban structures is crucial for safe building design. Although Large-eddy simulation (LES) is commonly used as a high-fidelity model as compared with the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, the present validation process relies on the comparison of fundamental statistics of the mean and standard deviations. The discrepancies in LESs and wind-tunnel experiments (WTEs) are unclear in terms of physical quantities characterizing the unsteadiness of the simulated turbulent flow such as probability density and power spectral densities, and low-occurrence winds speeds. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LES in predicting unsteady wind behavior around a 1:1:2 block model. The study identifies prominent differences to improve the accuracy of unsteady numerical simulations especially for the purpose of predicting low-occurrence wind speeds. Various advection schemes in LESs were investigated, including first-order upwind, second-order linear, and dynamic interpolation schemes. The results show significant discrepancies, particularly in higher-order statistics and low-occurrence wind speeds, with WTE consistently exhibiting higher energy levels across all frequencies. These findings highlight the need to refine advection schemes to enhance their predictive accuracy. LESs with minimal numerical errors from discretization schemes can substantially improve urban wind assessments and contribute to the design of safer structures.
publisher PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
publishDate 2025
container_volume 267
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112201
topic Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
topic_facet Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
accesstype
id WOS:001338853700001
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001338853700001
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1814778545010900992