Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes

A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including char...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, ICSE
Main Authors: Al Mamun, Mohammad; Wahab, Yasmin Abdul; Hossain, M. A. Motalib; Nam, Hui Yin; Johan, Mohd Rafie; Alias, Nurul Ezaila; Hussin, Hanim; Muhamad, Maizan
Format: Proceedings Paper
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001329134600036
author Al Mamun
Mohammad; Wahab
Yasmin Abdul; Hossain
M. A. Motalib; Nam
Hui Yin; Johan
Mohd Rafie; Alias
Nurul Ezaila; Hussin
Hanim; Muhamad
Maizan
spellingShingle Al Mamun
Mohammad; Wahab
Yasmin Abdul; Hossain
M. A. Motalib; Nam
Hui Yin; Johan
Mohd Rafie; Alias
Nurul Ezaila; Hussin
Hanim; Muhamad
Maizan
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
Engineering
author_facet Al Mamun
Mohammad; Wahab
Yasmin Abdul; Hossain
M. A. Motalib; Nam
Hui Yin; Johan
Mohd Rafie; Alias
Nurul Ezaila; Hussin
Hanim; Muhamad
Maizan
author_sort Al Mamun
spelling Al Mamun, Mohammad; Wahab, Yasmin Abdul; Hossain, M. A. Motalib; Nam, Hui Yin; Johan, Mohd Rafie; Alias, Nurul Ezaila; Hussin, Hanim; Muhamad, Maizan
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, ICSE
English
Proceedings Paper
A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6](3-/4-) as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10(-6) cms(-1)) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10(-6) cms(-1)) and SPGE (1.72x10(-6) cms(-1)) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications.
IEEE


2024


10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375
Engineering

WOS:001329134600036
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001329134600036
title Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_short Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_full Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_fullStr Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_sort Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
container_title 2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, ICSE
language English
format Proceedings Paper
description A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6](3-/4-) as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10(-6) cms(-1)) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10(-6) cms(-1)) and SPGE (1.72x10(-6) cms(-1)) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications.
publisher IEEE
issn

publishDate 2024
container_volume
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375
topic Engineering
topic_facet Engineering
accesstype
id WOS:001329134600036
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001329134600036
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1818940500584955904