Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including char...
Published in: | 2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, ICSE |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Proceedings Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001329134600036 |
author |
Al Mamun Mohammad; Wahab Yasmin Abdul; Hossain M. A. Motalib; Nam Hui Yin; Johan Mohd Rafie; Alias Nurul Ezaila; Hussin Hanim; Muhamad Maizan |
---|---|
spellingShingle |
Al Mamun Mohammad; Wahab Yasmin Abdul; Hossain M. A. Motalib; Nam Hui Yin; Johan Mohd Rafie; Alias Nurul Ezaila; Hussin Hanim; Muhamad Maizan Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes Engineering |
author_facet |
Al Mamun Mohammad; Wahab Yasmin Abdul; Hossain M. A. Motalib; Nam Hui Yin; Johan Mohd Rafie; Alias Nurul Ezaila; Hussin Hanim; Muhamad Maizan |
author_sort |
Al Mamun |
spelling |
Al Mamun, Mohammad; Wahab, Yasmin Abdul; Hossain, M. A. Motalib; Nam, Hui Yin; Johan, Mohd Rafie; Alias, Nurul Ezaila; Hussin, Hanim; Muhamad, Maizan Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes 2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, ICSE English Proceedings Paper A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6](3-/4-) as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10(-6) cms(-1)) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10(-6) cms(-1)) and SPGE (1.72x10(-6) cms(-1)) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications. IEEE 2024 10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375 Engineering WOS:001329134600036 https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001329134600036 |
title |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
title_short |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
title_full |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
title_sort |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
container_title |
2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, ICSE |
language |
English |
format |
Proceedings Paper |
description |
A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6](3-/4-) as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10(-6) cms(-1)) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10(-6) cms(-1)) and SPGE (1.72x10(-6) cms(-1)) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications. |
publisher |
IEEE |
issn |
|
publishDate |
2024 |
container_volume |
|
container_issue |
|
doi_str_mv |
10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375 |
topic |
Engineering |
topic_facet |
Engineering |
accesstype |
|
id |
WOS:001329134600036 |
url |
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001329134600036 |
record_format |
wos |
collection |
Web of Science (WoS) |
_version_ |
1818940500584955904 |