Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model

Autocorrelated statistical process control that is widely employed in process control environments typically uses the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model in fitting autocorrelated time series data. Nevertheless, the iterative modeling procedures of ARIMA are laborious, time-consum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Main Authors: Lee, Siaw Li; Liew, Chin Ying; Chen, Chee Khium; Voon, Li Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: INST INFORMATION SCIENCE 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001309309000008
author Lee
Siaw Li; Liew
Chin Ying; Chen
Chee Khium; Voon
Li Li
spellingShingle Lee
Siaw Li; Liew
Chin Ying; Chen
Chee Khium; Voon
Li Li
Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
Computer Science
author_facet Lee
Siaw Li; Liew
Chin Ying; Chen
Chee Khium; Voon
Li Li
author_sort Lee
spelling Lee, Siaw Li; Liew, Chin Ying; Chen, Chee Khium; Voon, Li Li
Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
English
Article
Autocorrelated statistical process control that is widely employed in process control environments typically uses the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model in fitting autocorrelated time series data. Nevertheless, the iterative modeling procedures of ARIMA are laborious, time-consuming, expensive, and complex. Meanwhile, autocorrelated data is governed by the geometric Brownian motion (GBM) law if its logarithmic returns are independent and identically normally distributed (i.i.n.d.). By utilizing these attributes, this paper aims to propose the Logarithmic Return (LR) model as an alternative methodology in modeling time series data. Twelve real-world datasets are used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed model. All computations are implemented via R-programming language. In addition to being parsimonious and easy to compute, the LR model is reported with a shorter Central Processing Unit (CPU) running time. Specifically, it typically takes an average of less than 0.20 seconds to obtain the LR model using twelve datasets, while its counterpart requires over 5 seconds. LR model has a comparable good mean average percentage error (MAPE) to the ARIMA model, thus LR model is as accurate as the ARIMA model. This study shows that the LR model with two parameters and requires a two-step implementation procedure is a promising alternative model of ARIMA for positive datasets in time series modeling.
INST INFORMATION SCIENCE
1016-2364

2024
40
5
10.6688/JISE.202409_40(5).0008
Computer Science

WOS:001309309000008
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001309309000008
title Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
title_short Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
title_full Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
title_fullStr Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
title_sort Comparing Model Building Performance of ARIMA Model and Logarithmic Return Model
container_title JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
language English
format Article
description Autocorrelated statistical process control that is widely employed in process control environments typically uses the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model in fitting autocorrelated time series data. Nevertheless, the iterative modeling procedures of ARIMA are laborious, time-consuming, expensive, and complex. Meanwhile, autocorrelated data is governed by the geometric Brownian motion (GBM) law if its logarithmic returns are independent and identically normally distributed (i.i.n.d.). By utilizing these attributes, this paper aims to propose the Logarithmic Return (LR) model as an alternative methodology in modeling time series data. Twelve real-world datasets are used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed model. All computations are implemented via R-programming language. In addition to being parsimonious and easy to compute, the LR model is reported with a shorter Central Processing Unit (CPU) running time. Specifically, it typically takes an average of less than 0.20 seconds to obtain the LR model using twelve datasets, while its counterpart requires over 5 seconds. LR model has a comparable good mean average percentage error (MAPE) to the ARIMA model, thus LR model is as accurate as the ARIMA model. This study shows that the LR model with two parameters and requires a two-step implementation procedure is a promising alternative model of ARIMA for positive datasets in time series modeling.
publisher INST INFORMATION SCIENCE
issn 1016-2364

publishDate 2024
container_volume 40
container_issue 5
doi_str_mv 10.6688/JISE.202409_40(5).0008
topic Computer Science
topic_facet Computer Science
accesstype
id WOS:001309309000008
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001309309000008
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1812871766347874304