Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor

A multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to produce a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is applied to address these two problems: increasing conversion and reducing operating cost (as the first optimization problem, P1) and increasing productivity and reducing operating cost (as the second optim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELING
Main Authors: Rohman, Fakhrony Sholahudin; Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan; Muhammad, Dinie; Zahan, Khairul Azly; Murat, Muhamad Nazri; Azmi, Ashraf
Format: Article; Early Access
Language:English
Published: WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001280385900001
author Rohman
Fakhrony Sholahudin; Alwi
Sharifah Rafidah Wan; Muhammad
Dinie; Zahan
Khairul Azly; Murat
Muhamad Nazri; Azmi
Ashraf
spellingShingle Rohman
Fakhrony Sholahudin; Alwi
Sharifah Rafidah Wan; Muhammad
Dinie; Zahan
Khairul Azly; Murat
Muhamad Nazri; Azmi
Ashraf
Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
Engineering
author_facet Rohman
Fakhrony Sholahudin; Alwi
Sharifah Rafidah Wan; Muhammad
Dinie; Zahan
Khairul Azly; Murat
Muhamad Nazri; Azmi
Ashraf
author_sort Rohman
spelling Rohman, Fakhrony Sholahudin; Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan; Muhammad, Dinie; Zahan, Khairul Azly; Murat, Muhamad Nazri; Azmi, Ashraf
Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELING
English
Article; Early Access
A multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to produce a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is applied to address these two problems: increasing conversion and reducing operating cost (as the first optimization problem, P1) and increasing productivity and reducing operating cost (as the second optimization problem, P2). ASPEN Plus software was utilized for the model-based optimization by executing the MOO algorithm using the tubular reactor model. The multi-objective optimization of multi-objective Bonobo optimisers (MOBO-I, MOBO-II and MOBO-III) are utilised to solve the optimization problem. The performance matrices, including hypervolume, pure diversity, and distance, are used to decide on the best MOO method. An inequality constraint was introduced on the temperature of the reactor to prevent run-away. According to the findings of the study, the MOBO-II for Problems 1 and 2 was the most effective MOO strategy. The reason is that the solution set found represents the most accurate, diversified, and acceptable distribution points alongside the Pareto Front (PF) in terms of homogeneity. The minimum operating cost, the maximum conversion and productivity obtained by MOBO-II are Mil. RM/year 114.3, 31.45 %, Mil. RM/year 545.3, respectively.
WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
1934-2659
2194-6159
2024


10.1515/cppm-2024-0023
Engineering

WOS:001280385900001
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001280385900001
title Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_short Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_full Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_fullStr Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_full_unstemmed Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_sort Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
container_title CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELING
language English
format Article; Early Access
description A multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to produce a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is applied to address these two problems: increasing conversion and reducing operating cost (as the first optimization problem, P1) and increasing productivity and reducing operating cost (as the second optimization problem, P2). ASPEN Plus software was utilized for the model-based optimization by executing the MOO algorithm using the tubular reactor model. The multi-objective optimization of multi-objective Bonobo optimisers (MOBO-I, MOBO-II and MOBO-III) are utilised to solve the optimization problem. The performance matrices, including hypervolume, pure diversity, and distance, are used to decide on the best MOO method. An inequality constraint was introduced on the temperature of the reactor to prevent run-away. According to the findings of the study, the MOBO-II for Problems 1 and 2 was the most effective MOO strategy. The reason is that the solution set found represents the most accurate, diversified, and acceptable distribution points alongside the Pareto Front (PF) in terms of homogeneity. The minimum operating cost, the maximum conversion and productivity obtained by MOBO-II are Mil. RM/year 114.3, 31.45 %, Mil. RM/year 545.3, respectively.
publisher WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
issn 1934-2659
2194-6159
publishDate 2024
container_volume
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1515/cppm-2024-0023
topic Engineering
topic_facet Engineering
accesstype
id WOS:001280385900001
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001280385900001
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1809679298195357696