Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models

Assessing riverine pollutant loads is a more realistic method for analysing point and non -point anthropogenic pollution sources throughout a watershed. This study compares numerous mathematical modelling strategies for estimating riverine loads based on the chosen water quality parameters: Biochemi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:RESULTS IN ENGINEERING
Main Authors: Khairudin, Khairunnisa; Ul-Saufie, Ahmad Zia; Senin, Syahrul Fithry; Zainudin, Zaki; Rashid, Ammar Mohd; Bakar, Noor Fitrah Abu; Wahid, Muhammad Zakwan Anas Abd; Azha, Syahida Farhan; Abd-Wahab, Firdaus; Wang, Lei; Sahar, Farisha Nerina; Osman, Mohamed Syazwan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ELSEVIER 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001228264500001
author Khairudin
Khairunnisa; Ul-Saufie
Ahmad Zia; Senin
Syahrul Fithry; Zainudin
Zaki; Rashid
Ammar Mohd; Bakar
Noor Fitrah Abu; Wahid
Muhammad Zakwan Anas Abd; Azha
Syahida Farhan; Abd-Wahab
Firdaus; Wang
Lei; Sahar
Farisha Nerina; Osman
Mohamed Syazwan
spellingShingle Khairudin
Khairunnisa; Ul-Saufie
Ahmad Zia; Senin
Syahrul Fithry; Zainudin
Zaki; Rashid
Ammar Mohd; Bakar
Noor Fitrah Abu; Wahid
Muhammad Zakwan Anas Abd; Azha
Syahida Farhan; Abd-Wahab
Firdaus; Wang
Lei; Sahar
Farisha Nerina; Osman
Mohamed Syazwan
Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
Engineering
author_facet Khairudin
Khairunnisa; Ul-Saufie
Ahmad Zia; Senin
Syahrul Fithry; Zainudin
Zaki; Rashid
Ammar Mohd; Bakar
Noor Fitrah Abu; Wahid
Muhammad Zakwan Anas Abd; Azha
Syahida Farhan; Abd-Wahab
Firdaus; Wang
Lei; Sahar
Farisha Nerina; Osman
Mohamed Syazwan
author_sort Khairudin
spelling Khairudin, Khairunnisa; Ul-Saufie, Ahmad Zia; Senin, Syahrul Fithry; Zainudin, Zaki; Rashid, Ammar Mohd; Bakar, Noor Fitrah Abu; Wahid, Muhammad Zakwan Anas Abd; Azha, Syahida Farhan; Abd-Wahab, Firdaus; Wang, Lei; Sahar, Farisha Nerina; Osman, Mohamed Syazwan
Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
RESULTS IN ENGINEERING
English
Article
Assessing riverine pollutant loads is a more realistic method for analysing point and non -point anthropogenic pollution sources throughout a watershed. This study compares numerous mathematical modelling strategies for estimating riverine loads based on the chosen water quality parameters: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Suspended Solids (SS), and Ammoniacal Nitrogen (NH 3 - N). A riverine load model was developed by employing various input variables including river flow and pollutant concentration values collected at several monitoring sites. Among the mathematical modelling methods employed are artificial neural networks with feed -forward backpropagation algorithms and radial basis functions. The classical multiple linear regression (MLR) statistical model was used for the comparison. Four widely used statistical performance assessment metrics were adopted to evaluate the performance of the various developed models: the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean relative error (MRE), and coefficient of determination (R 2 ). The considerable number of errors (with RMSE, MAE, and MRE) discovered in estimating riverine loads using the multiple linear regression (MLR) statistical model can be attributed to the nonlinear relationship between the independent variables (Q and C x ) and dependent variables (W). The feed -forward neural network model with a backpropagation algorithm and Bayesian regularisation training algorithm outperformed the radial basis neural network. This finding implies that, in addition to suspended sediment loads, riverine loads may be predicted using an artificial neural network using pollutant concentration (C x ) and river discharge (Q) as input variables. Other geographical and temporal fluctuation characteristics that may impact river water quality, on the other hand, may be incorporated as input variables to enhance riverine load prediction. Finally, riverine load analyses were successfully conducted to reduce the riverine load.
ELSEVIER
2590-1230

2024
22

10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102072
Engineering
gold
WOS:001228264500001
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001228264500001
title Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
title_short Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
title_full Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
title_fullStr Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
title_sort Enhancing riverine load prediction of anthropogenic pollutants: Harnessing the potential of feed-forward backpropagation (FFBP) artificial neural network (ANN) models
container_title RESULTS IN ENGINEERING
language English
format Article
description Assessing riverine pollutant loads is a more realistic method for analysing point and non -point anthropogenic pollution sources throughout a watershed. This study compares numerous mathematical modelling strategies for estimating riverine loads based on the chosen water quality parameters: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Suspended Solids (SS), and Ammoniacal Nitrogen (NH 3 - N). A riverine load model was developed by employing various input variables including river flow and pollutant concentration values collected at several monitoring sites. Among the mathematical modelling methods employed are artificial neural networks with feed -forward backpropagation algorithms and radial basis functions. The classical multiple linear regression (MLR) statistical model was used for the comparison. Four widely used statistical performance assessment metrics were adopted to evaluate the performance of the various developed models: the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean relative error (MRE), and coefficient of determination (R 2 ). The considerable number of errors (with RMSE, MAE, and MRE) discovered in estimating riverine loads using the multiple linear regression (MLR) statistical model can be attributed to the nonlinear relationship between the independent variables (Q and C x ) and dependent variables (W). The feed -forward neural network model with a backpropagation algorithm and Bayesian regularisation training algorithm outperformed the radial basis neural network. This finding implies that, in addition to suspended sediment loads, riverine loads may be predicted using an artificial neural network using pollutant concentration (C x ) and river discharge (Q) as input variables. Other geographical and temporal fluctuation characteristics that may impact river water quality, on the other hand, may be incorporated as input variables to enhance riverine load prediction. Finally, riverine load analyses were successfully conducted to reduce the riverine load.
publisher ELSEVIER
issn 2590-1230

publishDate 2024
container_volume 22
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102072
topic Engineering
topic_facet Engineering
accesstype gold
id WOS:001228264500001
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001228264500001
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1809679005274603520