Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments
The allocation of budgets for renewable energy (RE) technology is significantly influenced by geopolitical risks (GPRs), reflecting the intricate interplay among global political dynamics, social media narratives, and the strategic investment decisions essential for advancing sustainable energy solu...
Published in: | RISK ANALYSIS |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article; Early Access |
Language: | English |
Published: |
WILEY
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001207743600001 |
author |
Zheng Xin; Li Chang; Ali Sajid; Adebayo Tomiwa Sunday |
---|---|
spellingShingle |
Zheng Xin; Li Chang; Ali Sajid; Adebayo Tomiwa Sunday Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Mathematics; Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences |
author_facet |
Zheng Xin; Li Chang; Ali Sajid; Adebayo Tomiwa Sunday |
author_sort |
Zheng |
spelling |
Zheng, Xin; Li, Chang; Ali, Sajid; Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments RISK ANALYSIS English Article; Early Access The allocation of budgets for renewable energy (RE) technology is significantly influenced by geopolitical risks (GPRs), reflecting the intricate interplay among global political dynamics, social media narratives, and the strategic investment decisions essential for advancing sustainable energy solutions. Against the backdrop of increasing worldwide initiatives to transition to RE sources, it is crucial to understand how GPR affects funding allocations, informing policy decisions, and fostering international collaboration to pursue sustainable energy solutions. Existing work probes the nonlinear effect of GPR on RE technology budgets (RTB) within the top 10 economies characterized by substantial research and development investments in RE (China, USA, Germany, Japan, France, South Korea, India, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Italy). Past research largely focused on panel data techniques to delve the interconnection between GPR and RE technology, overlooking the distinctive characteristics of individual economies. Contrarily, existing investigation implements the Quantile-on-Quantile tool to explore this association on an economy-particular basis, enhancing the precision of our analysis and offering both a comprehensive global perspective and nuanced perceptions for entire countries. The findings manifest a significant reduction in funding for RE technology associated with GPR across various quantile levels in the chosen economies. The disparities in results spotlight the necessity for policymakers to perform thorough assessments and carry out competent strategies to address the variations in GPR and RTB. WILEY 0272-4332 1539-6924 2024 10.1111/risa.14310 Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Mathematics; Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences WOS:001207743600001 https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001207743600001 |
title |
Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments |
title_short |
Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments |
title_full |
Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments |
title_fullStr |
Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments |
title_sort |
Global chessboard: Analyzing how geopolitical risk shapes renewable energy technology investments |
container_title |
RISK ANALYSIS |
language |
English |
format |
Article; Early Access |
description |
The allocation of budgets for renewable energy (RE) technology is significantly influenced by geopolitical risks (GPRs), reflecting the intricate interplay among global political dynamics, social media narratives, and the strategic investment decisions essential for advancing sustainable energy solutions. Against the backdrop of increasing worldwide initiatives to transition to RE sources, it is crucial to understand how GPR affects funding allocations, informing policy decisions, and fostering international collaboration to pursue sustainable energy solutions. Existing work probes the nonlinear effect of GPR on RE technology budgets (RTB) within the top 10 economies characterized by substantial research and development investments in RE (China, USA, Germany, Japan, France, South Korea, India, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Italy). Past research largely focused on panel data techniques to delve the interconnection between GPR and RE technology, overlooking the distinctive characteristics of individual economies. Contrarily, existing investigation implements the Quantile-on-Quantile tool to explore this association on an economy-particular basis, enhancing the precision of our analysis and offering both a comprehensive global perspective and nuanced perceptions for entire countries. The findings manifest a significant reduction in funding for RE technology associated with GPR across various quantile levels in the chosen economies. The disparities in results spotlight the necessity for policymakers to perform thorough assessments and carry out competent strategies to address the variations in GPR and RTB. |
publisher |
WILEY |
issn |
0272-4332 1539-6924 |
publishDate |
2024 |
container_volume |
|
container_issue |
|
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/risa.14310 |
topic |
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Mathematics; Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences |
topic_facet |
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Mathematics; Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences |
accesstype |
|
id |
WOS:001207743600001 |
url |
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001207743600001 |
record_format |
wos |
collection |
Web of Science (WoS) |
_version_ |
1809679005471735808 |