Linear and volumetric shrinkage displacements of resin composite restorations with and without debonding

The study aimed to compare shrinkage displacements of fully and partially bonded resin composite restorations (RCRs). Two groups (n=5) Class-I RCR evaluated: Group 1 (G1) fully bonded and Group 2 (G2) debonded at the floor. Experimental results were compared with predictions from simple theory and f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL
Main Authors: Ab Ghani, Siti Mariam; Abu Hassan, Mohamed Ibrahim; Abdullah, Abdul Halim; Ab Ghani, Amir Radzi; Izra'ai, Saiful Islam; Aregawi, Wondwosen; Chew, Hooi Pin; Fok, Alex
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JAPANESE SOC DENTAL MATERIALS DEVICES 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001171100700007
Description
Summary:The study aimed to compare shrinkage displacements of fully and partially bonded resin composite restorations (RCRs). Two groups (n=5) Class-I RCR evaluated: Group 1 (G1) fully bonded and Group 2 (G2) debonded at the floor. Experimental results were compared with predictions from simple theory and finite element analysis (FEA). The experimental linear surface displacement (LSD) was G1 62.5 +/- 5.2 mu m and G2 32.8 +/- 4.0 mu m. Theoretically-predicted LSD for G1 60.1 +/- 7.4 mu m and G2 31.3 +/- 7.5 mu m. FEA-predicted LSD were G1 65.2 mu m and G2 34.6 mu m. The experimental volumetric surface displacement (VSD) was G1 1.22 +/- 0.2 mm(3) and G2 0.63 +/- 0.2 mm(3). Theoretically-predicted VSD for G1 1.36 +/- 0.2 mm(3) and G2 0.67 +/- 0.2 mm(3). No significant difference (p > 0.05) was found in LSD and VSD among the experimental, theoretical and FEA in the same group. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were noted between the two groups, with LSD and VSD of G2 values being almost half of G1. This pattern gave an insight of a debond restoration characteristics.
ISSN:0287-4547
DOI:10.4012/dmj.2023-023