Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study

ObjectivesTo assess the diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in breast cancer screening in a clinical setting.Materials and methodsAll patients who had 3D-ABUS between January 2014 and January 2022 for screening were included in this retrospective study. The images were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Main Authors: Wolterink, Femke Klein; Ab Mumin, Nazimah; Appelman, Linda; Derks-Rekers, Monique; Imhof-Tas, Mechli; Lardenoije, Susanne; van der Leest, Marloes; Mann, Ritse M.
Format: Article; Early Access
Language:English
Published: SPRINGER 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001147577000004
author Wolterink
Femke Klein; Ab Mumin
Nazimah; Appelman
Linda; Derks-Rekers
Monique; Imhof-Tas
Mechli; Lardenoije
Susanne; van der Leest
Marloes; Mann
Ritse M.
spellingShingle Wolterink
Femke Klein; Ab Mumin
Nazimah; Appelman
Linda; Derks-Rekers
Monique; Imhof-Tas
Mechli; Lardenoije
Susanne; van der Leest
Marloes; Mann
Ritse M.
Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
author_facet Wolterink
Femke Klein; Ab Mumin
Nazimah; Appelman
Linda; Derks-Rekers
Monique; Imhof-Tas
Mechli; Lardenoije
Susanne; van der Leest
Marloes; Mann
Ritse M.
author_sort Wolterink
spelling Wolterink, Femke Klein; Ab Mumin, Nazimah; Appelman, Linda; Derks-Rekers, Monique; Imhof-Tas, Mechli; Lardenoije, Susanne; van der Leest, Marloes; Mann, Ritse M.
Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
English
Article; Early Access
ObjectivesTo assess the diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in breast cancer screening in a clinical setting.Materials and methodsAll patients who had 3D-ABUS between January 2014 and January 2022 for screening were included in this retrospective study. The images were reported by 1 of 6 breast radiologists based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS). The 3D-ABUS was reviewed together with the digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value (PPV) and cancer detection yield were calculated.ResultsIn total, 3616 studies were performed in 1555 women (breast density C/D 95.5% (n = 3455/3616), breast density A/B 4.0% (n = 144/3616), density unknown (0.5% (n = 17/3616)). A total of 259 lesions were detected on 3D-ABUS (87.6% (n = 227/259) masses and 12.4% (n = 32/259) architectural distortions). The recall rate was 5.2% (n = 188/3616) (CI 4.5-6.0%) with only 36.7% (n = 69/188) cases recalled to another date. Moreover, recall declined over time. There were 3.4% (n = 123/3616) biopsies performed, with 52.8% (n = 65/123) biopsies due to an abnormality detected in 3D-ABUS alone. Ten of 65 lesions were malignant, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 15.4% (n = 10/65) (CI 7.6-26.5%)). The cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS is 2.77 per 1000 screening tests (CI 1.30-5.1).ConclusionThe cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS in a real clinical screening setting is comparable to the results reported in previous prospective studies, with lower recall and biopsy rates. 3D-ABUS also may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.Clinical relevance statement3D automated breast ultrasound screening performance in a clinical setting is comparable to previous prospective studies, with better recall and biopsy rates.Key Points center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal.center dot The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates.center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.Key Points center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal.center dot The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates.center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.Key Points center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal.center dot The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates. center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.
SPRINGER
0938-7994
1432-1084
2024


10.1007/s00330-023-10568-5
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
hybrid
WOS:001147577000004
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001147577000004
title Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
title_short Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
title_full Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
title_sort Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study
container_title EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
language English
format Article; Early Access
description ObjectivesTo assess the diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in breast cancer screening in a clinical setting.Materials and methodsAll patients who had 3D-ABUS between January 2014 and January 2022 for screening were included in this retrospective study. The images were reported by 1 of 6 breast radiologists based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS). The 3D-ABUS was reviewed together with the digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value (PPV) and cancer detection yield were calculated.ResultsIn total, 3616 studies were performed in 1555 women (breast density C/D 95.5% (n = 3455/3616), breast density A/B 4.0% (n = 144/3616), density unknown (0.5% (n = 17/3616)). A total of 259 lesions were detected on 3D-ABUS (87.6% (n = 227/259) masses and 12.4% (n = 32/259) architectural distortions). The recall rate was 5.2% (n = 188/3616) (CI 4.5-6.0%) with only 36.7% (n = 69/188) cases recalled to another date. Moreover, recall declined over time. There were 3.4% (n = 123/3616) biopsies performed, with 52.8% (n = 65/123) biopsies due to an abnormality detected in 3D-ABUS alone. Ten of 65 lesions were malignant, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 15.4% (n = 10/65) (CI 7.6-26.5%)). The cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS is 2.77 per 1000 screening tests (CI 1.30-5.1).ConclusionThe cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS in a real clinical screening setting is comparable to the results reported in previous prospective studies, with lower recall and biopsy rates. 3D-ABUS also may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.Clinical relevance statement3D automated breast ultrasound screening performance in a clinical setting is comparable to previous prospective studies, with better recall and biopsy rates.Key Points center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal.center dot The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates.center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.Key Points center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal.center dot The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates.center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.Key Points center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal.center dot The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates. center dot 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined.
publisher SPRINGER
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
publishDate 2024
container_volume
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-023-10568-5
topic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
topic_facet Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
accesstype hybrid
id WOS:001147577000004
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001147577000004
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1809678578852298752