Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background There is limited evidence of financial toxicity (FT) among cancer patients from countries of various income levels. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of objective and subjective FT and their measurements in relation to cancer treatment.Methods PubMed, Science Direct, Sco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
Main Authors: Azzani, Meram; Atroosh, Wahib Mohammed; Anbazhagan, Deepa; Kumarasamy, Vinoth; Abdalla, Mona Mohamed Ibrahim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001142797000001
author Azzani
Meram; Atroosh
Wahib Mohammed; Anbazhagan
Deepa; Kumarasamy
Vinoth; Abdalla
Mona Mohamed Ibrahim
spellingShingle Azzani
Meram; Atroosh
Wahib Mohammed; Anbazhagan
Deepa; Kumarasamy
Vinoth; Abdalla
Mona Mohamed Ibrahim
Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
author_facet Azzani
Meram; Atroosh
Wahib Mohammed; Anbazhagan
Deepa; Kumarasamy
Vinoth; Abdalla
Mona Mohamed Ibrahim
author_sort Azzani
spelling Azzani, Meram; Atroosh, Wahib Mohammed; Anbazhagan, Deepa; Kumarasamy, Vinoth; Abdalla, Mona Mohamed Ibrahim
Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
English
Article
Background There is limited evidence of financial toxicity (FT) among cancer patients from countries of various income levels. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of objective and subjective FT and their measurements in relation to cancer treatment.Methods PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched to find studies that examined FT. There was no limit on the design or setting of the study. Random-effects meta-analysis was utilized to obtain the pooled prevalence of objective FT.Results Out of 244 identified studies during the initial screening, only 64 studies were included in this review. The catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) method was often used in the included studies to determine the objective FT. The pooled prevalence of CHE was 47% (95% CI: 24.0-70.0) in middle- and high-income countries, and the highest percentage was noted in low-income countries (74.4%). A total of 30 studies focused on subjective FT, of which 9 used the Comprehensive Score for FT (COST) tool and reported median scores ranging between 17.0 and 31.9.Conclusion This study shows that cancer patients from various income-group countries experienced a significant financial burden during their treatment. It is imperative to conduct further studies on interventions and policies that can lower FT caused by cancer treatment.
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA

2296-2565
2024
11

10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266533
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
gold
WOS:001142797000001
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001142797000001
title Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
container_title FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
language English
format Article
description Background There is limited evidence of financial toxicity (FT) among cancer patients from countries of various income levels. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of objective and subjective FT and their measurements in relation to cancer treatment.Methods PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched to find studies that examined FT. There was no limit on the design or setting of the study. Random-effects meta-analysis was utilized to obtain the pooled prevalence of objective FT.Results Out of 244 identified studies during the initial screening, only 64 studies were included in this review. The catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) method was often used in the included studies to determine the objective FT. The pooled prevalence of CHE was 47% (95% CI: 24.0-70.0) in middle- and high-income countries, and the highest percentage was noted in low-income countries (74.4%). A total of 30 studies focused on subjective FT, of which 9 used the Comprehensive Score for FT (COST) tool and reported median scores ranging between 17.0 and 31.9.Conclusion This study shows that cancer patients from various income-group countries experienced a significant financial burden during their treatment. It is imperative to conduct further studies on interventions and policies that can lower FT caused by cancer treatment.
publisher FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
issn
2296-2565
publishDate 2024
container_volume 11
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266533
topic Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
topic_facet Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
accesstype gold
id WOS:001142797000001
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001142797000001
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1809678579021119488