Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department

Background: The practice of safe emergency medicine requires accurate and adequate assessments. However, screening for cognitive deficits is not performed regularly in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to determine factors influencing the frequency of cognitive testing by ED doctors. M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH
Main Authors: Zakaria, Mohd Idzwan; Suhaimi, Salimah; Pin, Tan Maw; Mokhtar, Mohd Amin Mohd; Zahedi, Ahmad Zulkarnain Ahmad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KOREAN GERIATRIC SOC 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001136656200002
author Zakaria
Mohd Idzwan; Suhaimi
Salimah; Pin
Tan Maw; Mokhtar
Mohd Amin Mohd; Zahedi
Ahmad Zulkarnain Ahmad
spellingShingle Zakaria
Mohd Idzwan; Suhaimi
Salimah; Pin
Tan Maw; Mokhtar
Mohd Amin Mohd; Zahedi
Ahmad Zulkarnain Ahmad
Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
Geriatrics & Gerontology
author_facet Zakaria
Mohd Idzwan; Suhaimi
Salimah; Pin
Tan Maw; Mokhtar
Mohd Amin Mohd; Zahedi
Ahmad Zulkarnain Ahmad
author_sort Zakaria
spelling Zakaria, Mohd Idzwan; Suhaimi, Salimah; Pin, Tan Maw; Mokhtar, Mohd Amin Mohd; Zahedi, Ahmad Zulkarnain Ahmad
Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH
English
Article
Background: The practice of safe emergency medicine requires accurate and adequate assessments. However, screening for cognitive deficits is not performed regularly in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to determine factors influencing the frequency of cognitive testing by ED doctors. Methods: This study included all doctors working in the EDs of three teaching hospitals. A 17-item online survey instrument that collected information on sex, experience, perceived prevalence, perception, and practice of cognitive assessment was distributed through electronic mail and data messaging services. Results: Of the 210 participants, 72 were male. The estimated mean with standard deviation prevalence of cognitive impairment in older patients in the ED was 39.5%+/- 19.7%. Among the participating ED doctors, 75.8% performed cognitive testing up to 10% of the time. Moreover, the participants ranked cognitive impairment the lowest compared to the other four chronic conditions in terms of its impact on hospitalization outcomes. Multiple linear regression revealed that the doctors' perceptions of the responsible personnel and the importance of cognitive testing, as well as their lack of expertise, were independently associated with the frequency of testing. Conclusion: Lack of expertise, perception of the importance of cognitive testing, and lack of consensus on which discipline is responsible for performing cognitive testing in older patients in the ED were the limiting factors in performing cognitive testing in the ED. Improving perception and awareness of the importance of cognitive assessment as a screening tool could improve the detection and overall management of older patients.
KOREAN GERIATRIC SOC
2508-4909

2023
27
4
10.4235/agmr.23.0150
Geriatrics & Gerontology
gold
WOS:001136656200002
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001136656200002
title Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
title_short Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
title_full Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
title_sort Factors which Influence the Frequency of Cognitive Assessment in the Emergency Department
container_title ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH
language English
format Article
description Background: The practice of safe emergency medicine requires accurate and adequate assessments. However, screening for cognitive deficits is not performed regularly in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to determine factors influencing the frequency of cognitive testing by ED doctors. Methods: This study included all doctors working in the EDs of three teaching hospitals. A 17-item online survey instrument that collected information on sex, experience, perceived prevalence, perception, and practice of cognitive assessment was distributed through electronic mail and data messaging services. Results: Of the 210 participants, 72 were male. The estimated mean with standard deviation prevalence of cognitive impairment in older patients in the ED was 39.5%+/- 19.7%. Among the participating ED doctors, 75.8% performed cognitive testing up to 10% of the time. Moreover, the participants ranked cognitive impairment the lowest compared to the other four chronic conditions in terms of its impact on hospitalization outcomes. Multiple linear regression revealed that the doctors' perceptions of the responsible personnel and the importance of cognitive testing, as well as their lack of expertise, were independently associated with the frequency of testing. Conclusion: Lack of expertise, perception of the importance of cognitive testing, and lack of consensus on which discipline is responsible for performing cognitive testing in older patients in the ED were the limiting factors in performing cognitive testing in the ED. Improving perception and awareness of the importance of cognitive assessment as a screening tool could improve the detection and overall management of older patients.
publisher KOREAN GERIATRIC SOC
issn 2508-4909

publishDate 2023
container_volume 27
container_issue 4
doi_str_mv 10.4235/agmr.23.0150
topic Geriatrics & Gerontology
topic_facet Geriatrics & Gerontology
accesstype gold
id WOS:001136656200002
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001136656200002
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1809678578468519936