Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies

The issue of urban liveability has been extensively debated by global agencies and scholars, as evidenced by the New Urban Agenda, in response to the impact of urbanisation. Urban liveability pertains to the ability of urban communities to achieve a high-quality living environment. While participato...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Main Authors: Zanudin, Khalid; Wikantiyoso, Respati; Bidin, Zafikha Aida; Rashid, Mohamad Fadhli
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: UNIV TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001108645300007
author Zanudin
Khalid; Wikantiyoso
Respati; Bidin
Zafikha Aida; Rashid
Mohamad Fadhli
spellingShingle Zanudin
Khalid; Wikantiyoso
Respati; Bidin
Zafikha Aida; Rashid
Mohamad Fadhli
Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
Construction & Building Technology
author_facet Zanudin
Khalid; Wikantiyoso
Respati; Bidin
Zafikha Aida; Rashid
Mohamad Fadhli
author_sort Zanudin
spelling Zanudin, Khalid; Wikantiyoso, Respati; Bidin, Zafikha Aida; Rashid, Mohamad Fadhli
Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
English
Review
The issue of urban liveability has been extensively debated by global agencies and scholars, as evidenced by the New Urban Agenda, in response to the impact of urbanisation. Urban liveability pertains to the ability of urban communities to achieve a high-quality living environment. While participatory planning is often presented as a means of empowering communities to attain better living conditions, it has presented challenges for decision-makers. Furthermore, dominant actors often influence participation processes, benefiting certain community segments. As a result, collaborative planning has emerged as an approach that seeks to address the interests of multiple urban factors by promoting consensus in decision-making. This paper aims to examine the collaborative planning methods that have been used in strategic planning that have empowered the community to participate in the planning process. Content analysis was employed as a research method to explore the empirical evidence of collaborative planning that has successfully empowered community participation in strategic planning and its impact on the liveability of metropolitan areas. Correspondingly, the Melbourne, Vancouver, and Helsinki case studies were selected based on five liveable city indices. This study's findings suggest a positive correlation between the implementation of collaborative planning by the selected metropolitan areas and their status as the most liveable cities. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on the role of collaborative planning in promoting urban liveability.
UNIV TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
2180-3242

2023
14
5
10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.003
Construction & Building Technology
Green Accepted, Green Published, gold
WOS:001108645300007
https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001108645300007
title Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
title_short Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
title_full Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
title_fullStr Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
title_full_unstemmed Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
title_sort Strategic Collaborative Planning for Urban Liveability: A Comparative Review of Metropolitan Area Case Studies
container_title INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
language English
format Review
description The issue of urban liveability has been extensively debated by global agencies and scholars, as evidenced by the New Urban Agenda, in response to the impact of urbanisation. Urban liveability pertains to the ability of urban communities to achieve a high-quality living environment. While participatory planning is often presented as a means of empowering communities to attain better living conditions, it has presented challenges for decision-makers. Furthermore, dominant actors often influence participation processes, benefiting certain community segments. As a result, collaborative planning has emerged as an approach that seeks to address the interests of multiple urban factors by promoting consensus in decision-making. This paper aims to examine the collaborative planning methods that have been used in strategic planning that have empowered the community to participate in the planning process. Content analysis was employed as a research method to explore the empirical evidence of collaborative planning that has successfully empowered community participation in strategic planning and its impact on the liveability of metropolitan areas. Correspondingly, the Melbourne, Vancouver, and Helsinki case studies were selected based on five liveable city indices. This study's findings suggest a positive correlation between the implementation of collaborative planning by the selected metropolitan areas and their status as the most liveable cities. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on the role of collaborative planning in promoting urban liveability.
publisher UNIV TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
issn 2180-3242

publishDate 2023
container_volume 14
container_issue 5
doi_str_mv 10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.003
topic Construction & Building Technology
topic_facet Construction & Building Technology
accesstype Green Accepted, Green Published, gold
id WOS:001108645300007
url https://www-webofscience-com.uitm.idm.oclc.org/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001108645300007
record_format wos
collection Web of Science (WoS)
_version_ 1809678578564988928