Occlusal force and occlusal contact reestablishment with resin-bonded fixed partial dental prostheses using the Dahl concept: A clinical study

Statement of problem: Space creation for a metal retainer of the resin-bonded fixed partial dental prostheses (RBFPDPs) with the Dahl concept remains controversial because of the lack of clinical studies. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the occlusal force and occlusal...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
主要作者: 2-s2.0-85099377505
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: Elsevier Inc. 2022
在線閱讀:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099377505&doi=10.1016%2fj.prosdent.2020.11.035&partnerID=40&md5=a6bd4aff8ee756beeb3aada3d1a2a992
實物特徵
總結:Statement of problem: Space creation for a metal retainer of the resin-bonded fixed partial dental prostheses (RBFPDPs) with the Dahl concept remains controversial because of the lack of clinical studies. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the occlusal force and occlusal contact reestablishment of RBFPDPs cemented at an increased occlusal vertical dimension (the Dahl concept) and to evaluate the factors affecting them. Material and methods: A prospective clinical study was carried out on 28 participants receiving cantilevered RBFPDPs at an increased occlusal vertical dimension at the Faculty of Dentistry, University Teknologi MARA. Maximum occlusal forces were recorded at precementation, postcementation, and 12-week review visit by using pressure indicating film, while occlusal contact reestablishment was assessed at the precementation stage and 12-week review visit by using shim stock foils. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis (α=.05). Results: Significant differences were found for maximum occlusal force between the precementation and the postcementation and between the postcementation and the 12-week review of RBFPDPs (P<.05 for both) in all 28 participants. However, no significant difference was found between the precementation and the 12-week review (P=.085). The occlusal force reestablishment concerning sex, age, location, and arch of the prosthesis was found to be similar. Most of the participants (89.3%) achieved complete occlusal contact reestablishment and 10.7% partial occlusal reestablishment. The demographic and prosthesis factors were not significantly related to the occlusal reestablishment (P>.05). Conclusions: Overall, occlusal force was reestablished after 12 weeks, and occlusal contact was completely reestablished in most participants after placement of RBFPDPs at an increased occlusal vertical dimension. © 2020 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
ISSN:223913
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.035