Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods

Compaction is the most important activity in the early stages of construction in order to improve engineering properties of soils. There are two main methods of compaction that are used in this study which are Static Packing Pressure and Standard Proctor Test. The static packing pressure test is dif...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
المؤلف الرئيسي: 2-s2.0-79251553452
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:English
منشور في: 2010
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79251553452&partnerID=40&md5=c013aa1822f1613dc7454e7018548280
id Hafez M.A.; Doris Asmani M.; Nurbaya S.
spelling Hafez M.A.; Doris Asmani M.; Nurbaya S.
2-s2.0-79251553452
Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
2010
Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
15 O


https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79251553452&partnerID=40&md5=c013aa1822f1613dc7454e7018548280
Compaction is the most important activity in the early stages of construction in order to improve engineering properties of soils. There are two main methods of compaction that are used in this study which are Static Packing Pressure and Standard Proctor Test. The static packing pressure test is different concept from dynamic compaction that has been produced by R.R Proctor, 1993. The concept produced by R.R Proctor has a few imperfections in determine the value of maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC). One of these imperfections is where we determine the OMC and MDD in soil laboratory using dynamic method to decide for the MDD and OMC of subgrade in which we use static compaction method to achieve it. Thus, a new method has been invented to determine the MDD and OMC values by using static compaction efforts in order close the gap between laboratory and field data. These study exam different classes of cohesive soils and the results obtained from MDD and OMC will be compared against the field results, it was found that the static pressure method is more practical and sensible than the dynamic compaction. Based in the laboratory results, Sample B under static pressure gives 2.014Mg/m3 as MDD while under dynamic it gives only 1.788Mg/m3. Therefore, the static test reached higher degree of compaction compared to dynamic method. This research will be developed further to improve engineering parameter especially for pavement design which is based on the value CBR. The Packing Pressure Compaction test is introduced as a new laboratory compaction method and it is suitable to measure the degree of compaction for Malaysian cohesive soils. © 2008 ejge.

10893032
English
Article

author 2-s2.0-79251553452
spellingShingle 2-s2.0-79251553452
Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
author_facet 2-s2.0-79251553452
author_sort 2-s2.0-79251553452
title Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
title_short Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
title_full Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
title_fullStr Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
title_sort Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods
publishDate 2010
container_title Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
container_volume 15 O
container_issue
doi_str_mv
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79251553452&partnerID=40&md5=c013aa1822f1613dc7454e7018548280
description Compaction is the most important activity in the early stages of construction in order to improve engineering properties of soils. There are two main methods of compaction that are used in this study which are Static Packing Pressure and Standard Proctor Test. The static packing pressure test is different concept from dynamic compaction that has been produced by R.R Proctor, 1993. The concept produced by R.R Proctor has a few imperfections in determine the value of maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC). One of these imperfections is where we determine the OMC and MDD in soil laboratory using dynamic method to decide for the MDD and OMC of subgrade in which we use static compaction method to achieve it. Thus, a new method has been invented to determine the MDD and OMC values by using static compaction efforts in order close the gap between laboratory and field data. These study exam different classes of cohesive soils and the results obtained from MDD and OMC will be compared against the field results, it was found that the static pressure method is more practical and sensible than the dynamic compaction. Based in the laboratory results, Sample B under static pressure gives 2.014Mg/m3 as MDD while under dynamic it gives only 1.788Mg/m3. Therefore, the static test reached higher degree of compaction compared to dynamic method. This research will be developed further to improve engineering parameter especially for pavement design which is based on the value CBR. The Packing Pressure Compaction test is introduced as a new laboratory compaction method and it is suitable to measure the degree of compaction for Malaysian cohesive soils. © 2008 ejge.
publisher
issn 10893032
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1828987884277858304