Comparing effectiveness of high-fidelity human patient simulation vs case-based learning in pharmacy education

Objective. To determine whether human patient simulation (HPS) is superior to case-based learning (CBL) in teaching diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and thyroid storm (TS) to pharmacy students.; Design. In this cross-over, open-label, single center, randomized control trial, final-year undergraduate phar...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
第一著者: 2-s2.0-84908299218
フォーマット: 論文
言語:English
出版事項: American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2014
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84908299218&doi=10.5688%2fajpe788153&partnerID=40&md5=759c6cd5c5c015da5996f1a0413f6772
その他の書誌記述
要約:Objective. To determine whether human patient simulation (HPS) is superior to case-based learning (CBL) in teaching diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and thyroid storm (TS) to pharmacy students.; Design. In this cross-over, open-label, single center, randomized control trial, final-year undergraduate pharmacy students enrolled in an applied therapeutics course were randomized to HPS or CBL groups. Pretest, posttest, knowledge retention tests, and satisfaction survey were administered to students.; Assessment. One hundred seventy-four students participated in this study. The effect sizes attributable to HPS were larger than CBL in both cases. HPS groups performed significantly better in posttest and knowledge retention test compared to CBL groups pertaining to TS case (p,0.05). Students expressed high levels of satisfaction with HPS sessions.; Conclusion. HPS was superior to CBL in teaching DKA and TS to final-year undergraduate pharmacy students. © 2014, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. All right reserved.
ISSN:29459
DOI:10.5688/ajpe788153