Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of shareholder activism led by the Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group (MSWG) on the performance of family-controlled firms in Malaysia from 2005 to 2009. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses event study methodology to calculate...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Managerial Auditing Journal
المؤلف الرئيسي: 2-s2.0-84866150612
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:English
منشور في: 2012
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84866150612&doi=10.1108%2f02686901211257046&partnerID=40&md5=bb6c06e8eb0a4a8d858b97d6b37b8b61
id Azizan S.S.; Ameer R.
spelling Azizan S.S.; Ameer R.
2-s2.0-84866150612
Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
2012
Managerial Auditing Journal
27
8
10.1108/02686901211257046
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84866150612&doi=10.1108%2f02686901211257046&partnerID=40&md5=bb6c06e8eb0a4a8d858b97d6b37b8b61
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of shareholder activism led by the Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group (MSWG) on the performance of family-controlled firms in Malaysia from 2005 to 2009. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses event study methodology to calculate abnormal returns for the sample and control firms. Findings: The paper finds significant positive cumulative abnormal returns of at least 0.5 percent for the targeted family firms, during the event window of [-1, 0] and [0, +1], as a result of MSWG engagement. There is a significant positive cumulative abnormal return of 1 percent for the firms where family control is less than the threshold level of 33 percent. It is interesting to note that MSWG engagements do not have consistent positive impact on the abnormal returns over the years. There are significant differences between the performance of MSWG targeted family-controlled firms and non-targeted family-controlled firms after one year of MSWG intervention. Research limitations/implications: The results show that MSWG-led shareholder activism does have an effect on the share returns of the family-controlled firms. These results imply that family-controlled firms agree with the MSWG on those matters that improve the bottom-line results. Originality/value: The authors argue that this is the first study to examine MSWG engagements with family-controlled firms in Malaysia. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

2686902
English
Article

author 2-s2.0-84866150612
spellingShingle 2-s2.0-84866150612
Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
author_facet 2-s2.0-84866150612
author_sort 2-s2.0-84866150612
title Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
title_short Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
title_full Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
title_fullStr Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
title_sort Shareholder activism in family-controlled firms in Malaysia
publishDate 2012
container_title Managerial Auditing Journal
container_volume 27
container_issue 8
doi_str_mv 10.1108/02686901211257046
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84866150612&doi=10.1108%2f02686901211257046&partnerID=40&md5=bb6c06e8eb0a4a8d858b97d6b37b8b61
description Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of shareholder activism led by the Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group (MSWG) on the performance of family-controlled firms in Malaysia from 2005 to 2009. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses event study methodology to calculate abnormal returns for the sample and control firms. Findings: The paper finds significant positive cumulative abnormal returns of at least 0.5 percent for the targeted family firms, during the event window of [-1, 0] and [0, +1], as a result of MSWG engagement. There is a significant positive cumulative abnormal return of 1 percent for the firms where family control is less than the threshold level of 33 percent. It is interesting to note that MSWG engagements do not have consistent positive impact on the abnormal returns over the years. There are significant differences between the performance of MSWG targeted family-controlled firms and non-targeted family-controlled firms after one year of MSWG intervention. Research limitations/implications: The results show that MSWG-led shareholder activism does have an effect on the share returns of the family-controlled firms. These results imply that family-controlled firms agree with the MSWG on those matters that improve the bottom-line results. Originality/value: The authors argue that this is the first study to examine MSWG engagements with family-controlled firms in Malaysia. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
publisher
issn 2686902
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1828987883876253696