Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including char...
| 出版年: | IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, ICSE |
|---|---|
| 第一著者: | |
| フォーマット: | Conference paper |
| 言語: | English |
| 出版事項: |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
2024
|
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206491403&doi=10.1109%2fICSE62991.2024.10681375&partnerID=40&md5=17291a4d96b706514f0a0c18e4637915 |
| id |
Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M. |
|---|---|
| spelling |
Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M. 2-s2.0-85206491403 Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes 2024 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, ICSE 10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206491403&doi=10.1109%2fICSE62991.2024.10681375&partnerID=40&md5=17291a4d96b706514f0a0c18e4637915 A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10-6 cms-1) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10-6 cms-1) and SPGE (1.72x10-6 cms-1) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications. © 2024 IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. English Conference paper |
| author |
2-s2.0-85206491403 |
| spellingShingle |
2-s2.0-85206491403 Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
| author_facet |
2-s2.0-85206491403 |
| author_sort |
2-s2.0-85206491403 |
| title |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
| title_short |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
| title_full |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
| title_fullStr |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
| title_sort |
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| container_title |
IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, ICSE |
| container_volume |
|
| container_issue |
|
| doi_str_mv |
10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375 |
| url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206491403&doi=10.1109%2fICSE62991.2024.10681375&partnerID=40&md5=17291a4d96b706514f0a0c18e4637915 |
| description |
A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10-6 cms-1) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10-6 cms-1) and SPGE (1.72x10-6 cms-1) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications. © 2024 IEEE. |
| publisher |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
| issn |
|
| language |
English |
| format |
Conference paper |
| accesstype |
|
| record_format |
scopus |
| collection |
Scopus |
| _version_ |
1828987862440214528 |