Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial decision-making processes is reshaping the administration of justice, offering new possibilities for efficiency and consistency while raising critical concerns about fairness and judicial discretion. This research explores the use of AI t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies
Main Author: Andriati S.L.; Rizki I.K.; Malian A.N.B.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85218227368&doi=10.15294%2fjils.v9i2.13683&partnerID=40&md5=73bb3a3e920bdc9149846e594e3c1596
id 2-s2.0-85218227368
spelling 2-s2.0-85218227368
Andriati S.L.; Rizki I.K.; Malian A.N.B.M.
Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
2024
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies
9
2
10.15294/jils.v9i2.13683
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85218227368&doi=10.15294%2fjils.v9i2.13683&partnerID=40&md5=73bb3a3e920bdc9149846e594e3c1596
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial decision-making processes is reshaping the administration of justice, offering new possibilities for efficiency and consistency while raising critical concerns about fairness and judicial discretion. This research explores the use of AI to support judges in their decision-making processes, focusing on the balance between technological assistance and the human consideration of justice. Additionally, it examines the regulatory frameworks that enable and govern AI’s role in the judiciary. Employing a normative juridical research methodology and secondary data from literature reviews, this study finds that AI systems can only assist judges by providing recommendations rather than replacing their judgment. Algorithms and mathematical models cannot fully account for the complex, qualitative factors inherent in the pursuit of justice, such as moral considerations, empathy, and societal context. Currently, AI usage in judicial processes is not explicitly regulated; however, it may be justified under Article 1 Point 8 of Indonesia’s ITE Law, which recognizes electronic agents controlled by humans to achieve specified objectives. The research underscores that AI’s potential lies in its capacity to complement human judges by enhancing efficiency and reducing bias in routine tasks, while ultimate decision-making must remain a human responsibility. This study concludes that the responsible use of AI, guided by clear legal and ethical frameworks, can ensure that technological advancements in the judiciary uphold the principles of justice and human dignity. © 2024, Universitas Negeri Semarang. All rights reserved.
Universitas Negeri Semarang
25481584
English
Article

author Andriati S.L.; Rizki I.K.; Malian A.N.B.M.
spellingShingle Andriati S.L.; Rizki I.K.; Malian A.N.B.M.
Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
author_facet Andriati S.L.; Rizki I.K.; Malian A.N.B.M.
author_sort Andriati S.L.; Rizki I.K.; Malian A.N.B.M.
title Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
title_short Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
title_full Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
title_fullStr Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
title_sort Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies
container_volume 9
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv 10.15294/jils.v9i2.13683
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85218227368&doi=10.15294%2fjils.v9i2.13683&partnerID=40&md5=73bb3a3e920bdc9149846e594e3c1596
description The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial decision-making processes is reshaping the administration of justice, offering new possibilities for efficiency and consistency while raising critical concerns about fairness and judicial discretion. This research explores the use of AI to support judges in their decision-making processes, focusing on the balance between technological assistance and the human consideration of justice. Additionally, it examines the regulatory frameworks that enable and govern AI’s role in the judiciary. Employing a normative juridical research methodology and secondary data from literature reviews, this study finds that AI systems can only assist judges by providing recommendations rather than replacing their judgment. Algorithms and mathematical models cannot fully account for the complex, qualitative factors inherent in the pursuit of justice, such as moral considerations, empathy, and societal context. Currently, AI usage in judicial processes is not explicitly regulated; however, it may be justified under Article 1 Point 8 of Indonesia’s ITE Law, which recognizes electronic agents controlled by humans to achieve specified objectives. The research underscores that AI’s potential lies in its capacity to complement human judges by enhancing efficiency and reducing bias in routine tasks, while ultimate decision-making must remain a human responsibility. This study concludes that the responsible use of AI, guided by clear legal and ethical frameworks, can ensure that technological advancements in the judiciary uphold the principles of justice and human dignity. © 2024, Universitas Negeri Semarang. All rights reserved.
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
issn 25481584
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1825722577433133056