Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm

The purpose of this research project is to address the growing issues presented by modified visual information by developing a deep learning model for identifying between real and fake images. To enhance accuracy, this project evaluates the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms such as Residual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Data Sciences
Main Author: Fatoni; Kurniawan T.B.; Dewi D.A.; Zakaria M.Z.; Muhayeddin A.M.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bright Publisher 2025
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216725093&doi=10.47738%2fjads.v6i1.490&partnerID=40&md5=8bb62099995120b401d9e3d6ecc852c6
id 2-s2.0-85216725093
spelling 2-s2.0-85216725093
Fatoni; Kurniawan T.B.; Dewi D.A.; Zakaria M.Z.; Muhayeddin A.M.M.
Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
2025
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
6
1
10.47738/jads.v6i1.490
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216725093&doi=10.47738%2fjads.v6i1.490&partnerID=40&md5=8bb62099995120b401d9e3d6ecc852c6
The purpose of this research project is to address the growing issues presented by modified visual information by developing a deep learning model for identifying between real and fake images. To enhance accuracy, this project evaluates the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms such as Residual Neural Network (ResNet), Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) together with Error Level Analysis (ELA) as preprocessing the dataset. The CASIA dataset contains 7,492 real images and 5,124 fake images. The images included are from a wide range of random subjects, including buildings, fruits, animals, and more, providing a comprehensive dataset for model training and validation. This research examined models' effectiveness through experiments, measuring their training and validation accuracies. It comes out with the best accuracy of each model, which is for Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), 94% for training accuracy, and validation accuracy of 92%. For VGG16, with both training and validation accuracy reaching 94%. Lastly, Residual Neural Network (ResNet) demonstrated optimal performance with 95% training accuracy and 93% validation accuracy. This project also constructs a system prototype for practical applications, offering an interface for real-world testing. When integrating into the system prototype, only Residual Neural Network (ResNet) shows consistency and effectiveness when predicting both fake and real images, and this led to the decision to choose ResNet for integration into the system. Furthermore, the project identified several areas for improvement. Firstly, expanding the model comparison for discovering more successful algorithms. Next, improving the dataset preprocessing phase by incorporating filtering or denoising techniques. Lastly, refining the system prototype for greater appeal and user-friendliness has the potential to attract a larger audience. © 2025 Authors.
Bright Publisher
27236471
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Fatoni; Kurniawan T.B.; Dewi D.A.; Zakaria M.Z.; Muhayeddin A.M.M.
spellingShingle Fatoni; Kurniawan T.B.; Dewi D.A.; Zakaria M.Z.; Muhayeddin A.M.M.
Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
author_facet Fatoni; Kurniawan T.B.; Dewi D.A.; Zakaria M.Z.; Muhayeddin A.M.M.
author_sort Fatoni; Kurniawan T.B.; Dewi D.A.; Zakaria M.Z.; Muhayeddin A.M.M.
title Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
title_short Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
title_full Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
title_fullStr Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
title_sort Fake vs Real Image Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm
publishDate 2025
container_title Journal of Applied Data Sciences
container_volume 6
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.47738/jads.v6i1.490
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216725093&doi=10.47738%2fjads.v6i1.490&partnerID=40&md5=8bb62099995120b401d9e3d6ecc852c6
description The purpose of this research project is to address the growing issues presented by modified visual information by developing a deep learning model for identifying between real and fake images. To enhance accuracy, this project evaluates the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms such as Residual Neural Network (ResNet), Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) together with Error Level Analysis (ELA) as preprocessing the dataset. The CASIA dataset contains 7,492 real images and 5,124 fake images. The images included are from a wide range of random subjects, including buildings, fruits, animals, and more, providing a comprehensive dataset for model training and validation. This research examined models' effectiveness through experiments, measuring their training and validation accuracies. It comes out with the best accuracy of each model, which is for Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), 94% for training accuracy, and validation accuracy of 92%. For VGG16, with both training and validation accuracy reaching 94%. Lastly, Residual Neural Network (ResNet) demonstrated optimal performance with 95% training accuracy and 93% validation accuracy. This project also constructs a system prototype for practical applications, offering an interface for real-world testing. When integrating into the system prototype, only Residual Neural Network (ResNet) shows consistency and effectiveness when predicting both fake and real images, and this led to the decision to choose ResNet for integration into the system. Furthermore, the project identified several areas for improvement. Firstly, expanding the model comparison for discovering more successful algorithms. Next, improving the dataset preprocessing phase by incorporating filtering or denoising techniques. Lastly, refining the system prototype for greater appeal and user-friendliness has the potential to attract a larger audience. © 2025 Authors.
publisher Bright Publisher
issn 27236471
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1825722575798403072