Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments

Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, partic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cogent Education
Main Author: Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2025
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85215067233&doi=10.1080%2f2331186X.2025.2451497&partnerID=40&md5=12874e68904b0fa21f5efaf0dae7cf54
id 2-s2.0-85215067233
spelling 2-s2.0-85215067233
Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R.
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
2025
Cogent Education
12
1
10.1080/2331186X.2025.2451497
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85215067233&doi=10.1080%2f2331186X.2025.2451497&partnerID=40&md5=12874e68904b0fa21f5efaf0dae7cf54
Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, particularly since they face challenges coping with the changes in the learning environment. With technology-based learning environments, the learning environments is a lot more technology-based. Investigating student engagement provides guidelines for monitoring the student’s direction in the learning process. Hence, this study examined how students react in a hybrid class. A causal-comparison research design was employed between hybrid face-to-face and online environments, comparing engagement guides to determine which environment promotes more positive engagement. A random sample was collected to generalise university students’ learning in a hybrid environment. Overall, students in a face-to-face environment showed relatively higher engagement (mean = 3.9730) than students in a virtual environment (mean = 3.770). They demonstrated relatively high-performance engagement (mean = 4.1626) and skill engagement (mean = 4.0244). Even though the result showed no significant difference in overall engagement between the two groups, further analysis showed a significant difference in performance engagement, indicating that the face-to-face group showed significantly higher performance engagement than the virtual group. The correlation analyses revealed a relationship between the engagement constructs, indicating participation has a higher correlation with emotion (in the face-to-face environment) and skill (in the virtual environment). The correlation results revealed a significant contribution from participation engagement, even though it has the lowest value in the descriptive statistics. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
2331186X
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R.
spellingShingle Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R.
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
author_facet Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R.
author_sort Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R.
title Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
title_short Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
title_full Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
title_fullStr Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
title_full_unstemmed Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
title_sort Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
publishDate 2025
container_title Cogent Education
container_volume 12
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2451497
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85215067233&doi=10.1080%2f2331186X.2025.2451497&partnerID=40&md5=12874e68904b0fa21f5efaf0dae7cf54
description Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, particularly since they face challenges coping with the changes in the learning environment. With technology-based learning environments, the learning environments is a lot more technology-based. Investigating student engagement provides guidelines for monitoring the student’s direction in the learning process. Hence, this study examined how students react in a hybrid class. A causal-comparison research design was employed between hybrid face-to-face and online environments, comparing engagement guides to determine which environment promotes more positive engagement. A random sample was collected to generalise university students’ learning in a hybrid environment. Overall, students in a face-to-face environment showed relatively higher engagement (mean = 3.9730) than students in a virtual environment (mean = 3.770). They demonstrated relatively high-performance engagement (mean = 4.1626) and skill engagement (mean = 4.0244). Even though the result showed no significant difference in overall engagement between the two groups, further analysis showed a significant difference in performance engagement, indicating that the face-to-face group showed significantly higher performance engagement than the virtual group. The correlation analyses revealed a relationship between the engagement constructs, indicating participation has a higher correlation with emotion (in the face-to-face environment) and skill (in the virtual environment). The correlation results revealed a significant contribution from participation engagement, even though it has the lowest value in the descriptive statistics. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd.
issn 2331186X
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1823296151806279680