Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments
Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, partic...
Published in: | Cogent Education |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
2025
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85215067233&doi=10.1080%2f2331186X.2025.2451497&partnerID=40&md5=12874e68904b0fa21f5efaf0dae7cf54 |
id |
2-s2.0-85215067233 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85215067233 Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R. Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments 2025 Cogent Education 12 1 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2451497 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85215067233&doi=10.1080%2f2331186X.2025.2451497&partnerID=40&md5=12874e68904b0fa21f5efaf0dae7cf54 Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, particularly since they face challenges coping with the changes in the learning environment. With technology-based learning environments, the learning environments is a lot more technology-based. Investigating student engagement provides guidelines for monitoring the student’s direction in the learning process. Hence, this study examined how students react in a hybrid class. A causal-comparison research design was employed between hybrid face-to-face and online environments, comparing engagement guides to determine which environment promotes more positive engagement. A random sample was collected to generalise university students’ learning in a hybrid environment. Overall, students in a face-to-face environment showed relatively higher engagement (mean = 3.9730) than students in a virtual environment (mean = 3.770). They demonstrated relatively high-performance engagement (mean = 4.1626) and skill engagement (mean = 4.0244). Even though the result showed no significant difference in overall engagement between the two groups, further analysis showed a significant difference in performance engagement, indicating that the face-to-face group showed significantly higher performance engagement than the virtual group. The correlation analyses revealed a relationship between the engagement constructs, indicating participation has a higher correlation with emotion (in the face-to-face environment) and skill (in the virtual environment). The correlation results revealed a significant contribution from participation engagement, even though it has the lowest value in the descriptive statistics. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2331186X English Article All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
author |
Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R. |
spellingShingle |
Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R. Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments |
author_facet |
Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R. |
author_sort |
Teoh S.H.; Boon Zik Hong J.; Md Shamsudin N.; Singh P.; Hartono R. |
title |
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments |
title_short |
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments |
title_full |
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments |
title_fullStr |
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments |
title_sort |
Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments |
publishDate |
2025 |
container_title |
Cogent Education |
container_volume |
12 |
container_issue |
1 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/2331186X.2025.2451497 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85215067233&doi=10.1080%2f2331186X.2025.2451497&partnerID=40&md5=12874e68904b0fa21f5efaf0dae7cf54 |
description |
Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, particularly since they face challenges coping with the changes in the learning environment. With technology-based learning environments, the learning environments is a lot more technology-based. Investigating student engagement provides guidelines for monitoring the student’s direction in the learning process. Hence, this study examined how students react in a hybrid class. A causal-comparison research design was employed between hybrid face-to-face and online environments, comparing engagement guides to determine which environment promotes more positive engagement. A random sample was collected to generalise university students’ learning in a hybrid environment. Overall, students in a face-to-face environment showed relatively higher engagement (mean = 3.9730) than students in a virtual environment (mean = 3.770). They demonstrated relatively high-performance engagement (mean = 4.1626) and skill engagement (mean = 4.0244). Even though the result showed no significant difference in overall engagement between the two groups, further analysis showed a significant difference in performance engagement, indicating that the face-to-face group showed significantly higher performance engagement than the virtual group. The correlation analyses revealed a relationship between the engagement constructs, indicating participation has a higher correlation with emotion (in the face-to-face environment) and skill (in the virtual environment). The correlation results revealed a significant contribution from participation engagement, even though it has the lowest value in the descriptive statistics. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
publisher |
Taylor and Francis Ltd. |
issn |
2331186X |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1823296151806279680 |