Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainers. The original questionnaire was forward- and backward-translated, followed by four validity tests (content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity) and tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Author: Saw Z.K.; Yuen J.J.X.; Ashari A.; Bahemia F.I.; Low Y.X.; Mustapha N.M.N.; Lau M.N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2025
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85214113509&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0314853&partnerID=40&md5=57da1ddb8cf9cd10835a5a46772120b4
id 2-s2.0-85214113509
spelling 2-s2.0-85214113509
Saw Z.K.; Yuen J.J.X.; Ashari A.; Bahemia F.I.; Low Y.X.; Mustapha N.M.N.; Lau M.N.
Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
2025
PLoS ONE
20
1 January
10.1371/journal.pone.0314853
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85214113509&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0314853&partnerID=40&md5=57da1ddb8cf9cd10835a5a46772120b4
This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainers. The original questionnaire was forward- and backward-translated, followed by four validity tests (content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity) and two reliability tests (test-retest reliability, internal consistency). Content validity was assessed by nine orthodontists who appraised the questionnaire’s representativeness, relevance, clarity, and necessity. Face validity was established through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 35 English-literate participants currently wearing orthodontic retainers. Construct validity was established through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). For criterion validity, 107 participants concurrently answered the questionnaire and the Retainer-modified Malaysian Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was verified by 34 subjects who responded to the questionnaire again after a two-week interval. Six revised items passed the threshold value of 0.78 for Item-Content Validity Index and Content Validity Ratio and were revised based on findings from the face validity test. Principal Component Analysis of EFA extracted information on only one component, and all items were positively correlated with the component matrix. Spearman’s rho value (rs = 0.490 and rs = 0.416) indicated a moderate correlation between the two questionnaires for criterion validity. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ranged from 0.687 to 0.913, indicating moderate to excellent test-retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.687 to 0.913 indicating that none of the questionnaire items showed unacceptable or poor internal consistency. The questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainers has been validated and can be used in both clinical and research settings. © 2025 Saw et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Public Library of Science
19326203
English
Article

author Saw Z.K.; Yuen J.J.X.; Ashari A.; Bahemia F.I.; Low Y.X.; Mustapha N.M.N.; Lau M.N.
spellingShingle Saw Z.K.; Yuen J.J.X.; Ashari A.; Bahemia F.I.; Low Y.X.; Mustapha N.M.N.; Lau M.N.
Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
author_facet Saw Z.K.; Yuen J.J.X.; Ashari A.; Bahemia F.I.; Low Y.X.; Mustapha N.M.N.; Lau M.N.
author_sort Saw Z.K.; Yuen J.J.X.; Ashari A.; Bahemia F.I.; Low Y.X.; Mustapha N.M.N.; Lau M.N.
title Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
title_short Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
title_full Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
title_fullStr Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
title_full_unstemmed Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
title_sort Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer
publishDate 2025
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 20
container_issue 1 January
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0314853
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85214113509&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0314853&partnerID=40&md5=57da1ddb8cf9cd10835a5a46772120b4
description This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainers. The original questionnaire was forward- and backward-translated, followed by four validity tests (content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity) and two reliability tests (test-retest reliability, internal consistency). Content validity was assessed by nine orthodontists who appraised the questionnaire’s representativeness, relevance, clarity, and necessity. Face validity was established through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 35 English-literate participants currently wearing orthodontic retainers. Construct validity was established through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). For criterion validity, 107 participants concurrently answered the questionnaire and the Retainer-modified Malaysian Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was verified by 34 subjects who responded to the questionnaire again after a two-week interval. Six revised items passed the threshold value of 0.78 for Item-Content Validity Index and Content Validity Ratio and were revised based on findings from the face validity test. Principal Component Analysis of EFA extracted information on only one component, and all items were positively correlated with the component matrix. Spearman’s rho value (rs = 0.490 and rs = 0.416) indicated a moderate correlation between the two questionnaires for criterion validity. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ranged from 0.687 to 0.913, indicating moderate to excellent test-retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.687 to 0.913 indicating that none of the questionnaire items showed unacceptable or poor internal consistency. The questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainers has been validated and can be used in both clinical and research settings. © 2025 Saw et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
publisher Public Library of Science
issn 19326203
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1823296151421452288