The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing

Numerous studies have demonstrated that mouth rinsing with glucose enhance exercise; however, research on fructose is comparatively limited. Owing to unexpected taste preferences, fructose is rarely used in carbohydrate mouth rinsing studies. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare perc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Physical Education and Sport
Main Author: Bakar A.H.A.; Zamani N.Z.; Jamaludin M.; Ismail Z.; Kamaruddin H.K.; Ismail A.D.; Zainuddin N.F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura Universitatii din Pitesti 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213060187&doi=10.7752%2fjpes.2024.10271&partnerID=40&md5=7ae1f1ef895c068a3f347b813b976731
id 2-s2.0-85213060187
spelling 2-s2.0-85213060187
Bakar A.H.A.; Zamani N.Z.; Jamaludin M.; Ismail Z.; Kamaruddin H.K.; Ismail A.D.; Zainuddin N.F.
The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
2024
Journal of Physical Education and Sport
24
10
10.7752/jpes.2024.10271
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213060187&doi=10.7752%2fjpes.2024.10271&partnerID=40&md5=7ae1f1ef895c068a3f347b813b976731
Numerous studies have demonstrated that mouth rinsing with glucose enhance exercise; however, research on fructose is comparatively limited. Owing to unexpected taste preferences, fructose is rarely used in carbohydrate mouth rinsing studies. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare perceived taste between glucose and fructose solutions. Ninety-six participants were assigned perform a set of mouth rinse trials with three different solutions in double blind-manner. Participants were instructed to rinse 25 mL of 6% glucose, 5.3% fructose, and 21.2% fructose for 10 seconds. Prior to using the second and third solutions for rinsing, participants were instructed to cleanse their mouth by rinsing with warm water. Following the warm water mouth rinse, participants were asked to assess the visual analog scale and taste test questionnaire before proceeding to rinse with the subsequent solution. The research revealed that the mean score of 21.2% for fructose was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in terms of preferred, sweetness and intensity compared to glucose at 6% and fructose at 5.3%. However, for taste, fructose 5.3% has greater mean than others. In general, fructose was predominantly favoured as preferred choice, likely due to its appealing sweetness and intensity. The findings recommend considering higher caloric intake of fructose during mouth rinsing to enhance brain activation and exercise performance, as fructose appears to be a more favoured option compared to glucose. This insight could guide future studies in this direction. © 2024, Editura Universitatii din Pitesti. All rights reserved.
Editura Universitatii din Pitesti
22478051
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Bakar A.H.A.; Zamani N.Z.; Jamaludin M.; Ismail Z.; Kamaruddin H.K.; Ismail A.D.; Zainuddin N.F.
spellingShingle Bakar A.H.A.; Zamani N.Z.; Jamaludin M.; Ismail Z.; Kamaruddin H.K.; Ismail A.D.; Zainuddin N.F.
The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
author_facet Bakar A.H.A.; Zamani N.Z.; Jamaludin M.; Ismail Z.; Kamaruddin H.K.; Ismail A.D.; Zainuddin N.F.
author_sort Bakar A.H.A.; Zamani N.Z.; Jamaludin M.; Ismail Z.; Kamaruddin H.K.; Ismail A.D.; Zainuddin N.F.
title The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
title_short The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
title_full The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
title_fullStr The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
title_full_unstemmed The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
title_sort The preferable taste between glucose and fructose during mouth rinsing
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Physical Education and Sport
container_volume 24
container_issue 10
doi_str_mv 10.7752/jpes.2024.10271
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213060187&doi=10.7752%2fjpes.2024.10271&partnerID=40&md5=7ae1f1ef895c068a3f347b813b976731
description Numerous studies have demonstrated that mouth rinsing with glucose enhance exercise; however, research on fructose is comparatively limited. Owing to unexpected taste preferences, fructose is rarely used in carbohydrate mouth rinsing studies. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare perceived taste between glucose and fructose solutions. Ninety-six participants were assigned perform a set of mouth rinse trials with three different solutions in double blind-manner. Participants were instructed to rinse 25 mL of 6% glucose, 5.3% fructose, and 21.2% fructose for 10 seconds. Prior to using the second and third solutions for rinsing, participants were instructed to cleanse their mouth by rinsing with warm water. Following the warm water mouth rinse, participants were asked to assess the visual analog scale and taste test questionnaire before proceeding to rinse with the subsequent solution. The research revealed that the mean score of 21.2% for fructose was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in terms of preferred, sweetness and intensity compared to glucose at 6% and fructose at 5.3%. However, for taste, fructose 5.3% has greater mean than others. In general, fructose was predominantly favoured as preferred choice, likely due to its appealing sweetness and intensity. The findings recommend considering higher caloric intake of fructose during mouth rinsing to enhance brain activation and exercise performance, as fructose appears to be a more favoured option compared to glucose. This insight could guide future studies in this direction. © 2024, Editura Universitatii din Pitesti. All rights reserved.
publisher Editura Universitatii din Pitesti
issn 22478051
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1820775431804026880