The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults

Objective: The widespread adoption of digital devices has surged, particularly since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Nearly everyone now owns devices like laptops, tablets, or smartphones, offering options for light mode (positive polarity) and dark mode (negative polarity) to suit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Main Author: Muhamad N.; Mokhtar N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prince of Songkla University 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85208645122&doi=10.31584%2fjhsmr.20241095&partnerID=40&md5=a0b25af650c6fef2b2c1941de4b547dd
id 2-s2.0-85208645122
spelling 2-s2.0-85208645122
Muhamad N.; Mokhtar N.
The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
2024
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
42
6
10.31584/jhsmr.20241095
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85208645122&doi=10.31584%2fjhsmr.20241095&partnerID=40&md5=a0b25af650c6fef2b2c1941de4b547dd
Objective: The widespread adoption of digital devices has surged, particularly since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Nearly everyone now owns devices like laptops, tablets, or smartphones, offering options for light mode (positive polarity) and dark mode (negative polarity) to suit individual preferences. This study examines how display polarity affects reading performance among young adults. Material and Methods: Thirty participants engaged in a 15-minute reading task on a laptop with randomly assigned display polarities, followed by a 15-minute break before repeating the task. Results: Reading speed, measured in words per minute (wpm), differed significantly between polarities, with negative polarity yielding higher speeds (136.27±25.58 wpm) compared to positive polarity (128.42±19.98 wpm), Z=-2.355, p-value<0.05. However, no significant polarity-related differences were found in reading errors, including mispronunciation (p-value=0.193) or omission (p-value=0.113). Conclusion: Negative polarity displays enhanced reading performance by increasing reading speed; while reading errors remained unaffected. © 2024 JHSMR. Hosted by Prince of Songkla University. All rights reserved.
Prince of Songkla University
25869981
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Muhamad N.; Mokhtar N.
spellingShingle Muhamad N.; Mokhtar N.
The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
author_facet Muhamad N.; Mokhtar N.
author_sort Muhamad N.; Mokhtar N.
title The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
title_short The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
title_full The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
title_fullStr The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
title_sort The Effect of Display Polarity on Reading Speed and Reading Error Among Young Adults
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
container_volume 42
container_issue 6
doi_str_mv 10.31584/jhsmr.20241095
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85208645122&doi=10.31584%2fjhsmr.20241095&partnerID=40&md5=a0b25af650c6fef2b2c1941de4b547dd
description Objective: The widespread adoption of digital devices has surged, particularly since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Nearly everyone now owns devices like laptops, tablets, or smartphones, offering options for light mode (positive polarity) and dark mode (negative polarity) to suit individual preferences. This study examines how display polarity affects reading performance among young adults. Material and Methods: Thirty participants engaged in a 15-minute reading task on a laptop with randomly assigned display polarities, followed by a 15-minute break before repeating the task. Results: Reading speed, measured in words per minute (wpm), differed significantly between polarities, with negative polarity yielding higher speeds (136.27±25.58 wpm) compared to positive polarity (128.42±19.98 wpm), Z=-2.355, p-value<0.05. However, no significant polarity-related differences were found in reading errors, including mispronunciation (p-value=0.193) or omission (p-value=0.113). Conclusion: Negative polarity displays enhanced reading performance by increasing reading speed; while reading errors remained unaffected. © 2024 JHSMR. Hosted by Prince of Songkla University. All rights reserved.
publisher Prince of Songkla University
issn 25869981
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1818940550345129984