A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method

Selecting an appropriate Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method to provide a solution to assist design engineers in prioritising the right criteria in the early design process is essential. Part of the aim of this study is to establish an integration CRITIC-TOPIS for selecting the most efficie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
Main Author: Rahman M.H.A.; Rahman S.M.A.; Jumaidin R.; Mahmud J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85208508072&doi=10.47836%2fpjst.32.6.14&partnerID=40&md5=afc56e1db08c48f1665487a4fbcd6907
id 2-s2.0-85208508072
spelling 2-s2.0-85208508072
Rahman M.H.A.; Rahman S.M.A.; Jumaidin R.; Mahmud J.
A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
2024
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
32
6
10.47836/pjst.32.6.14
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85208508072&doi=10.47836%2fpjst.32.6.14&partnerID=40&md5=afc56e1db08c48f1665487a4fbcd6907
Selecting an appropriate Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method to provide a solution to assist design engineers in prioritising the right criteria in the early design process is essential. Part of the aim of this study is to establish an integration CRITIC-TOPIS for selecting the most efficient framework to choose performance criteria, namely density, tensile strength, Young’s modulus, cellulose, and elongation at break for natural fibre material intended for cap toe shoes like abaca, bamboo, coir, jute, kenaf, sisal. Hence, a new framework was proposed and tested based on integrating Criteria Importance Through Inter Criteria Correlation (CRITIC)-Technique Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Therefore, this proposed framework consists of two phases: the first involves determining the weights of attributes using the CRITIC method, and the second consists of making material criteria decisions using the TOPSIS method. Meanwhile, to achieve this objective, numerical validation was obtained using data from selected past case studies, which were then replicated to validate the output of the proposed framework. According to the validation conducted using CRITIC-TOPSIS, the results show a significant level of similarity, with the rankings being consistent. Therefore, the proposed methodology may provide imprecise and ambiguous information for prioritising the performance criteria of natural fibre composite materials. Moreover, design engineers can utilise this framework in the composite industry to create the best possible evaluation model for composite material criteria selection for various applications. © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
01287680
English
Article

author Rahman M.H.A.; Rahman S.M.A.; Jumaidin R.; Mahmud J.
spellingShingle Rahman M.H.A.; Rahman S.M.A.; Jumaidin R.; Mahmud J.
A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
author_facet Rahman M.H.A.; Rahman S.M.A.; Jumaidin R.; Mahmud J.
author_sort Rahman M.H.A.; Rahman S.M.A.; Jumaidin R.; Mahmud J.
title A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
title_short A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
title_full A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
title_fullStr A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
title_full_unstemmed A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
title_sort A Framework for Prioritising the Performance Criteria of Natural Fibre Composite Materials: Incorporation of CRITIC-TOPSIS Method
publishDate 2024
container_title Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
container_volume 32
container_issue 6
doi_str_mv 10.47836/pjst.32.6.14
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85208508072&doi=10.47836%2fpjst.32.6.14&partnerID=40&md5=afc56e1db08c48f1665487a4fbcd6907
description Selecting an appropriate Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method to provide a solution to assist design engineers in prioritising the right criteria in the early design process is essential. Part of the aim of this study is to establish an integration CRITIC-TOPIS for selecting the most efficient framework to choose performance criteria, namely density, tensile strength, Young’s modulus, cellulose, and elongation at break for natural fibre material intended for cap toe shoes like abaca, bamboo, coir, jute, kenaf, sisal. Hence, a new framework was proposed and tested based on integrating Criteria Importance Through Inter Criteria Correlation (CRITIC)-Technique Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Therefore, this proposed framework consists of two phases: the first involves determining the weights of attributes using the CRITIC method, and the second consists of making material criteria decisions using the TOPSIS method. Meanwhile, to achieve this objective, numerical validation was obtained using data from selected past case studies, which were then replicated to validate the output of the proposed framework. According to the validation conducted using CRITIC-TOPSIS, the results show a significant level of similarity, with the rankings being consistent. Therefore, the proposed methodology may provide imprecise and ambiguous information for prioritising the performance criteria of natural fibre composite materials. Moreover, design engineers can utilise this framework in the composite industry to create the best possible evaluation model for composite material criteria selection for various applications. © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
issn 01287680
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1820775432417443840