Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes

A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including char...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, ICSE
Main Author: Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206491403&doi=10.1109%2fICSE62991.2024.10681375&partnerID=40&md5=17291a4d96b706514f0a0c18e4637915
id 2-s2.0-85206491403
spelling 2-s2.0-85206491403
Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M.
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
2024
IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, ICSE


10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206491403&doi=10.1109%2fICSE62991.2024.10681375&partnerID=40&md5=17291a4d96b706514f0a0c18e4637915
A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10-6 cms-1) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10-6 cms-1) and SPGE (1.72x10-6 cms-1) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications. © 2024 IEEE.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

English
Conference paper

author Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M.
spellingShingle Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M.
Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
author_facet Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M.
author_sort Al Mamun M.; Wahab Y.A.; Hossain M.A.M.; Nam H.Y.; Johan M.R.; Alias N.E.; Hussin H.; Muhamad M.
title Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_short Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_full Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_fullStr Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
title_sort Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Screen Printed Carbon, Gold and Graphene Electrodes
publishDate 2024
container_title IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, ICSE
container_volume
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICSE62991.2024.10681375
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206491403&doi=10.1109%2fICSE62991.2024.10681375&partnerID=40&md5=17291a4d96b706514f0a0c18e4637915
description A comparative analysis of the electrochemical performance of screen printed carbon (SPCE), gold (SPGE), and graphene (SPGrE) electrodes is presented before integration into electrochemical biosensors. The electrodes were systematically examined based on key electrochemical parameters, including charge transfer kinetics, electrochemical reproducibility, and stability, considering [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- as a typical redox analyte using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Results indicate that all the bare screen printed electrodes (SPEs) demonstrate significant irreproducibility (>10% of RSD) with poor stability of the electroactive surface. The graphene electrodes exhibit superior electrocatalytic properties with higher interfacial charge transfer rate constant (2.30x10-6 cms-1) compared to the SPCE (1.40x10-6 cms-1) and SPGE (1.72x10-6 cms-1) surfaces. The findings provide valuable insights into the relative merits and drawbacks of SPEs, guiding the selection of suitable electrode materials for diverse biosensing applications. © 2024 IEEE.
publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
issn
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1814778501101780992