Enhancing Supplier Selection for Sustainable Raw Materials: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and TOPSIS Methods

Background: This research endeavors to enhance supplier selection processes by combining the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodologies, with a specific focus on sustainability criteria. Method: Initially comprising 21...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Logistics
Main Author: Masudin I.; Habibah I.Z.; Wardana R.W.; Restuputri D.P.; Shariff S.S.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85205107205&doi=10.3390%2flogistics8030074&partnerID=40&md5=b5bd5e8bbe3c42408574a75a47c0c354
Description
Summary:Background: This research endeavors to enhance supplier selection processes by combining the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodologies, with a specific focus on sustainability criteria. Method: Initially comprising 21 sub-criteria derived from prior research, the selection criteria are refined to 17, eliminating redundant elements. The core principle guiding this refinement is the comprehensive coverage of economic, social, and environmental dimensions, essential for sustainable supplier evaluation. Results: The study’s outcomes underscore the paramount importance of economic criteria (0.0652) in supplier selection, followed by environmental (0.0343) and social dimensions (0.0503). Key sub-criteria contributing significantly to this evaluation encompassed consistent product quality, competitive raw material pricing, proficient labor capabilities, recycling potential, punctual delivery performance, and effective waste management practices. Conclusions: These sub-criteria are thoughtfully integrated into the sustainable assessment framework, aligning seamlessly with the economic, environmental, and social criteria. © 2024 by the authors.
ISSN:23056290
DOI:10.3390/logistics8030074