Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform
Game-based learning platforms (GBPs), such as Kahoot!, are tools that can enhance learning experiences for both lecturers and students. However, existing studies on GBPs often yield inconclusive results due to a narrow definition of learning that does not fully address both the input and output stag...
Published in: | CALL-EJ |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Pacific Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning (PacCALL)
2024
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204391891&partnerID=40&md5=605a286678669b7bf1a548cfbe87feec |
id |
2-s2.0-85204391891 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85204391891 Mihat W.; Lun W.W.; Yik L.H.; Seau L.S. Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform 2024 CALL-EJ 25 2 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204391891&partnerID=40&md5=605a286678669b7bf1a548cfbe87feec Game-based learning platforms (GBPs), such as Kahoot!, are tools that can enhance learning experiences for both lecturers and students. However, existing studies on GBPs often yield inconclusive results due to a narrow definition of learning that does not fully address both the input and output stages. Additionally, there is also a lack of comparative information on the perspectives of lecturers and students. This study therefore aims to investigate the perceptions of lecturers and students regarding the use of GBPs and the discrepancies between them. It involves 252 students undertaking compulsory English courses and 130 lecturers teaching English at a language centre in a Malaysian university. Data were collected using a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design, which included questionnaires and follow-up interviews. The findings suggest that both lecturers and students agree that GBPs have positively influenced their teaching and learning experiences. However, subtle differences between the two groups were observed, especially in motivation, likely due to the teaching preferences, reliability of the tool in summative assessment, and issue with GBPs subscription. In conclusion, this study highlights the need to further study policy implementations on the ground, particularly at the ICT initiatives involving lecturers in higher institutions. © 2024, The Pacific Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning (PacCALL). All rights reserved. The Pacific Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning (PacCALL) 21879036 English Article |
author |
Mihat W.; Lun W.W.; Yik L.H.; Seau L.S. |
spellingShingle |
Mihat W.; Lun W.W.; Yik L.H.; Seau L.S. Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform |
author_facet |
Mihat W.; Lun W.W.; Yik L.H.; Seau L.S. |
author_sort |
Mihat W.; Lun W.W.; Yik L.H.; Seau L.S. |
title |
Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform |
title_short |
Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform |
title_full |
Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform |
title_fullStr |
Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform |
title_sort |
Kahoot! in Higher Institution: A Comparative Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions on a Game-Based Learning Platform |
publishDate |
2024 |
container_title |
CALL-EJ |
container_volume |
25 |
container_issue |
2 |
doi_str_mv |
|
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204391891&partnerID=40&md5=605a286678669b7bf1a548cfbe87feec |
description |
Game-based learning platforms (GBPs), such as Kahoot!, are tools that can enhance learning experiences for both lecturers and students. However, existing studies on GBPs often yield inconclusive results due to a narrow definition of learning that does not fully address both the input and output stages. Additionally, there is also a lack of comparative information on the perspectives of lecturers and students. This study therefore aims to investigate the perceptions of lecturers and students regarding the use of GBPs and the discrepancies between them. It involves 252 students undertaking compulsory English courses and 130 lecturers teaching English at a language centre in a Malaysian university. Data were collected using a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design, which included questionnaires and follow-up interviews. The findings suggest that both lecturers and students agree that GBPs have positively influenced their teaching and learning experiences. However, subtle differences between the two groups were observed, especially in motivation, likely due to the teaching preferences, reliability of the tool in summative assessment, and issue with GBPs subscription. In conclusion, this study highlights the need to further study policy implementations on the ground, particularly at the ICT initiatives involving lecturers in higher institutions. © 2024, The Pacific Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning (PacCALL). All rights reserved. |
publisher |
The Pacific Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning (PacCALL) |
issn |
21879036 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1818940552388804608 |