Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System

The need for renewable energy in power systems is growing exponentially. Several algorithms may be used to track the Maximum Power Point (MPP) quickly and precisely. This research provides a comparison and analysis of different control techniques for the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a phot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:2024 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems, I2CACIS 2024 - Proceedings
Main Author: Bin Lokman Fikry A.S.; Saaidin S.; Sulaiman N.; Kutty S.B.; Kassim M.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85203794210&doi=10.1109%2fI2CACIS61270.2024.10649624&partnerID=40&md5=f1ab530e68dfb20f3bda639879dbc976
id 2-s2.0-85203794210
spelling 2-s2.0-85203794210
Bin Lokman Fikry A.S.; Saaidin S.; Sulaiman N.; Kutty S.B.; Kassim M.
Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
2024
2024 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems, I2CACIS 2024 - Proceedings


10.1109/I2CACIS61270.2024.10649624
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85203794210&doi=10.1109%2fI2CACIS61270.2024.10649624&partnerID=40&md5=f1ab530e68dfb20f3bda639879dbc976
The need for renewable energy in power systems is growing exponentially. Several algorithms may be used to track the Maximum Power Point (MPP) quickly and precisely. This research provides a comparison and analysis of different control techniques for the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a photovoltaic system subject to varying irradiance and temperature by using three algorithms which are Perturb and Observe (PO), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Hybrid NN-PO. The three MPPT algorithms were created in a standalone photovoltaic system with a boost converter to maintain the maximum power point of the solar panel. Using MATLAB/SIMULINK software, the performance of these controllers is evaluated under varying irradiance and temperature conditions. Under the 100 (W/m2s) slope, PO's efficiency is the lowest, at 96.443% and the hybrid efficiency is nearly identical to the ANN algorithm at 99,996% and 99,997%, respectively. Based on the simulation that has been demonstrated, the Perturb and Observe (PO) algorithm exhibits the lowest performance in the simulation with time response. The Hybrid Neural Network and Neural Network algorithm performs better than PO. At the same time, hybrid efficiency is similar to the ANN algorithm. © 2024 IEEE.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

English
Conference paper

author Bin Lokman Fikry A.S.; Saaidin S.; Sulaiman N.; Kutty S.B.; Kassim M.
spellingShingle Bin Lokman Fikry A.S.; Saaidin S.; Sulaiman N.; Kutty S.B.; Kassim M.
Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
author_facet Bin Lokman Fikry A.S.; Saaidin S.; Sulaiman N.; Kutty S.B.; Kassim M.
author_sort Bin Lokman Fikry A.S.; Saaidin S.; Sulaiman N.; Kutty S.B.; Kassim M.
title Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
title_short Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
title_full Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
title_fullStr Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
title_full_unstemmed Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
title_sort Neural Network (NN), Perturb and Observe (PO), and Hybrid NN-PO for MPPT Controller in PV System
publishDate 2024
container_title 2024 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems, I2CACIS 2024 - Proceedings
container_volume
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1109/I2CACIS61270.2024.10649624
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85203794210&doi=10.1109%2fI2CACIS61270.2024.10649624&partnerID=40&md5=f1ab530e68dfb20f3bda639879dbc976
description The need for renewable energy in power systems is growing exponentially. Several algorithms may be used to track the Maximum Power Point (MPP) quickly and precisely. This research provides a comparison and analysis of different control techniques for the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a photovoltaic system subject to varying irradiance and temperature by using three algorithms which are Perturb and Observe (PO), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Hybrid NN-PO. The three MPPT algorithms were created in a standalone photovoltaic system with a boost converter to maintain the maximum power point of the solar panel. Using MATLAB/SIMULINK software, the performance of these controllers is evaluated under varying irradiance and temperature conditions. Under the 100 (W/m2s) slope, PO's efficiency is the lowest, at 96.443% and the hybrid efficiency is nearly identical to the ANN algorithm at 99,996% and 99,997%, respectively. Based on the simulation that has been demonstrated, the Perturb and Observe (PO) algorithm exhibits the lowest performance in the simulation with time response. The Hybrid Neural Network and Neural Network algorithm performs better than PO. At the same time, hybrid efficiency is similar to the ANN algorithm. © 2024 IEEE.
publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
issn
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871795655573504