| Summary: | Optimization on an industrial scale is a complex task that involves fine-tuning the performance of large-scale systems and applications to make them more efficient and effective. This process can be challenging due to the increasing volume of work, growing system complexity, and the need to maintain optimal performance. Due to the significant power required for compression and the high costs of reactant materials, optimizing low-density polyethylene (LDPE) production to provide maximum productivity with a reduction of energy cost is required. However, it is not a simple process because the optimization problem of the LDPE tubular reactor consists of conflicting objective functions. Multi-objective neural network algorithm (MONNA) is a metaheuristic optimization method that provides a versatile and robust approach for solving complex, contradictory targets and diverse optimization problems that do not rely on specific mathematical properties of the problem. It is inspired by the structure and information-processing capabilities of biological neural networks. MONNA iteratively proposes solutions, evaluates its performance, and adjusts its approach based on feedback, which avoids complex mathematical formulations. In this work, we implement Multi-objective optimization neural network algorithm (MONNA) in LDPE tubular reactor for maximising productivity, conversion and minimising energy costs with three scenario of problem optimization, i.e. maximising productivity and reducing energy cost for the first problem (P1); increasing conversion and reducing energy costs for the second problem (P2); and increasing productivity and reducing by-products for the third problem (P3). The results show that the highest productivity, highest conversion, and lowest energy are 545.1 mil. RM/year, 0.314, and 0.672 mil. RM/year. The extreme points in the Pareto Front (PF) for various bi-objective situations provide practitioners with helpful information for selecting the best trade-off for the operational strategy. According to their preferences, decision-makers can use the resulting Pareto to decide on the most acceptable alternative. The decision variable plots show that both initiators in the reacting zone highly affected the optimal solution with the opposite action. © 2024
|
|---|