Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling

This study systematically analyses the performance differences between superstrate and substrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells using comprehensive numerical simulations. Factors such as absorber thickness, radiative recombination, defect density, operating temperature, and series and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Materials Science
Main Author: Abd Rashid W.N.; Sapeli M.M.I.; Putthisigamany Y.; Rahman K.S.; Ahmad Ludin N.; Ibrahim M.A.; Chelvanathan P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85201664975&doi=10.1007%2fs10853-024-10090-z&partnerID=40&md5=962681592a080d824e7df6359ef503eb
id 2-s2.0-85201664975
spelling 2-s2.0-85201664975
Abd Rashid W.N.; Sapeli M.M.I.; Putthisigamany Y.; Rahman K.S.; Ahmad Ludin N.; Ibrahim M.A.; Chelvanathan P.
Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
2024
Journal of Materials Science
59
32
10.1007/s10853-024-10090-z
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85201664975&doi=10.1007%2fs10853-024-10090-z&partnerID=40&md5=962681592a080d824e7df6359ef503eb
This study systematically analyses the performance differences between superstrate and substrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells using comprehensive numerical simulations. Factors such as absorber thickness, radiative recombination, defect density, operating temperature, and series and shunt resistances are examined for their impact on power conversion efficiency (PCE) and external quantum efficiency (EQE). Results indicate that superstrate configurations achieve higher efficiencies with thinner absorber layers compared to substrate configurations. At an optimal absorber thickness of 3 µm, the superstrate configuration exhibits a PCE of 20.34%, Voc of 1.1175 V, Jsc of 21.38 mA cm−2, and FF of 85.16%. In contrast, the substrate configuration shows a PCE of 18%, Voc of 1.121 V, Jsc of 22.12 mA cm−2, and FF of 72.58%. Radiative recombination significantly impacts FF, influencing the efficiency differences. Superstrate designs are less sensitive to variations in shunt and series resistances and perform robustly across a wider range of resistance values. While superstrates generally perform better at higher temperatures, their efficiency declines more steeply with further temperature increases compared to substrates. This simulation-based analysis highlights the superior performance of superstrate configurations and provides a foundation for future empirical research and optimization in thin-film solar cell technology. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
Springer
222461
English
Article

author Abd Rashid W.N.; Sapeli M.M.I.; Putthisigamany Y.; Rahman K.S.; Ahmad Ludin N.; Ibrahim M.A.; Chelvanathan P.
spellingShingle Abd Rashid W.N.; Sapeli M.M.I.; Putthisigamany Y.; Rahman K.S.; Ahmad Ludin N.; Ibrahim M.A.; Chelvanathan P.
Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
author_facet Abd Rashid W.N.; Sapeli M.M.I.; Putthisigamany Y.; Rahman K.S.; Ahmad Ludin N.; Ibrahim M.A.; Chelvanathan P.
author_sort Abd Rashid W.N.; Sapeli M.M.I.; Putthisigamany Y.; Rahman K.S.; Ahmad Ludin N.; Ibrahim M.A.; Chelvanathan P.
title Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
title_short Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
title_full Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
title_sort Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Materials Science
container_volume 59
container_issue 32
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10853-024-10090-z
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85201664975&doi=10.1007%2fs10853-024-10090-z&partnerID=40&md5=962681592a080d824e7df6359ef503eb
description This study systematically analyses the performance differences between superstrate and substrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells using comprehensive numerical simulations. Factors such as absorber thickness, radiative recombination, defect density, operating temperature, and series and shunt resistances are examined for their impact on power conversion efficiency (PCE) and external quantum efficiency (EQE). Results indicate that superstrate configurations achieve higher efficiencies with thinner absorber layers compared to substrate configurations. At an optimal absorber thickness of 3 µm, the superstrate configuration exhibits a PCE of 20.34%, Voc of 1.1175 V, Jsc of 21.38 mA cm−2, and FF of 85.16%. In contrast, the substrate configuration shows a PCE of 18%, Voc of 1.121 V, Jsc of 22.12 mA cm−2, and FF of 72.58%. Radiative recombination significantly impacts FF, influencing the efficiency differences. Superstrate designs are less sensitive to variations in shunt and series resistances and perform robustly across a wider range of resistance values. While superstrates generally perform better at higher temperatures, their efficiency declines more steeply with further temperature increases compared to substrates. This simulation-based analysis highlights the superior performance of superstrate configurations and provides a foundation for future empirical research and optimization in thin-film solar cell technology. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
publisher Springer
issn 222461
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871794663620608