Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands

The purpose of this study is to analyze the dispute settlement binding Trade Agreement (PPJB) unit flats through litigation in Indonesia compared to the Netherlands and to analyze the reconstruction of the law in dispute resolution PPJB in Indonesia to provide legal certainty. The main problem in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Main Author: Yuniyanti S.S.; Siska F.; Dian A.B.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85201205565&doi=10.15294%2fjllr.vol5i1.2159&partnerID=40&md5=f33b573bbeca66d8cba81027243ccf77
id 2-s2.0-85201205565
spelling 2-s2.0-85201205565
Yuniyanti S.S.; Siska F.; Dian A.B.M.
Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
2024
Journal of Law and Legal Reform
5
1
10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2159
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85201205565&doi=10.15294%2fjllr.vol5i1.2159&partnerID=40&md5=f33b573bbeca66d8cba81027243ccf77
The purpose of this study is to analyze the dispute settlement binding Trade Agreement (PPJB) unit flats through litigation in Indonesia compared to the Netherlands and to analyze the reconstruction of the law in dispute resolution PPJB in Indonesia to provide legal certainty. The main problem in this paper is that the dispute resolution of the binding Trade Agreement in Indonesia has not provided legal certainty due to court decisions that are difficult to implement due to weak supervision. This research method is normative research with a comparative approach. The urgency of this study is that 276 PPJB disputes in Indonesia are resolved through the courts are difficult to implement. The novelty of this study lies in the researchers ' efforts to reconstruct the law of flats, especially in the implementation of PPJB dispute court decisions. The results showed PPJB dispute settlement unit flats through litigation, experienced obstacles in the application of the judge's ruling, which won the consumer as the injured party. The obstacles to the application of the ruling do not provide legal certainty for consumers. In the Netherlands, the settlement of flat sale and purchase disputes is carried out through non-litigation channels that are more effective in providing legal certainty. Legal reconstruction in PPJB dispute resolution in Indonesia to provide legal certainty that is to accommodate the provisions of supervision for putting the court's decision into action or arbitration decisions in PPJB dispute resolution, as outlined in the provisions of Article 105 of the flats law. © 2024 Authors.
Universitas Negeri Semarang
27150941
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Yuniyanti S.S.; Siska F.; Dian A.B.M.
spellingShingle Yuniyanti S.S.; Siska F.; Dian A.B.M.
Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
author_facet Yuniyanti S.S.; Siska F.; Dian A.B.M.
author_sort Yuniyanti S.S.; Siska F.; Dian A.B.M.
title Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
title_short Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
title_full Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
title_fullStr Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
title_sort Enhancing legal certainty for consumers in apartment unit trade: A comparative analysis of dispute settlement agreements in Indonesia and the Netherlands
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Law and Legal Reform
container_volume 5
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2159
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85201205565&doi=10.15294%2fjllr.vol5i1.2159&partnerID=40&md5=f33b573bbeca66d8cba81027243ccf77
description The purpose of this study is to analyze the dispute settlement binding Trade Agreement (PPJB) unit flats through litigation in Indonesia compared to the Netherlands and to analyze the reconstruction of the law in dispute resolution PPJB in Indonesia to provide legal certainty. The main problem in this paper is that the dispute resolution of the binding Trade Agreement in Indonesia has not provided legal certainty due to court decisions that are difficult to implement due to weak supervision. This research method is normative research with a comparative approach. The urgency of this study is that 276 PPJB disputes in Indonesia are resolved through the courts are difficult to implement. The novelty of this study lies in the researchers ' efforts to reconstruct the law of flats, especially in the implementation of PPJB dispute court decisions. The results showed PPJB dispute settlement unit flats through litigation, experienced obstacles in the application of the judge's ruling, which won the consumer as the injured party. The obstacles to the application of the ruling do not provide legal certainty for consumers. In the Netherlands, the settlement of flat sale and purchase disputes is carried out through non-litigation channels that are more effective in providing legal certainty. Legal reconstruction in PPJB dispute resolution in Indonesia to provide legal certainty that is to accommodate the provisions of supervision for putting the court's decision into action or arbitration decisions in PPJB dispute resolution, as outlined in the provisions of Article 105 of the flats law. © 2024 Authors.
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
issn 27150941
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678472118796288