Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor

A multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to produce a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is applied to address these two problems: increasing conversion and reducing operating cost (as the first optimization problem, P1) and increasing productivity and reducing operating cost (as the second optim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Main Author: Rohman F.S.; Wan Alwi S.R.; Muhammad D.; Zahan K.A.; Murat M.N.; Azmi A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85200218341&doi=10.1515%2fcppm-2024-0023&partnerID=40&md5=dfd7f32b89c5cbf725940a9f308016b9
id 2-s2.0-85200218341
spelling 2-s2.0-85200218341
Rohman F.S.; Wan Alwi S.R.; Muhammad D.; Zahan K.A.; Murat M.N.; Azmi A.
Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
2024
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
19
4
10.1515/cppm-2024-0023
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85200218341&doi=10.1515%2fcppm-2024-0023&partnerID=40&md5=dfd7f32b89c5cbf725940a9f308016b9
A multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to produce a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is applied to address these two problems: increasing conversion and reducing operating cost (as the first optimization problem, P1) and increasing productivity and reducing operating cost (as the second optimization problem, P2). ASPEN Plus software was utilized for the model-based optimization by executing the MOO algorithm using the tubular reactor model. The multi-objective optimization of multi-objective Bonobo optimisers (MOBO-I, MOBO-II and MOBO-III) are utilised to solve the optimization problem. The performance matrices, including hypervolume, pure diversity, and distance, are used to decide on the best MOO method. An inequality constraint was introduced on the temperature of the reactor to prevent run-away. According to the findings of the study, the MOBO-II for Problems 1 and 2 was the most effective MOO strategy. The reason is that the solution set found represents the most accurate, diversified, and acceptable distribution points alongside the Pareto Front (PF) in terms of homogeneity. The minimum operating cost, the maximum conversion and productivity obtained by MOBO-II are Mil. RM/year 114.3, 31.45 %, Mil. RM/year 545.3, respectively. © 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
19342659
English
Article

author Rohman F.S.; Wan Alwi S.R.; Muhammad D.; Zahan K.A.; Murat M.N.; Azmi A.
spellingShingle Rohman F.S.; Wan Alwi S.R.; Muhammad D.; Zahan K.A.; Murat M.N.; Azmi A.
Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
author_facet Rohman F.S.; Wan Alwi S.R.; Muhammad D.; Zahan K.A.; Murat M.N.; Azmi A.
author_sort Rohman F.S.; Wan Alwi S.R.; Muhammad D.; Zahan K.A.; Murat M.N.; Azmi A.
title Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_short Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_full Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_fullStr Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_full_unstemmed Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
title_sort Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
publishDate 2024
container_title Chemical Product and Process Modeling
container_volume 19
container_issue 4
doi_str_mv 10.1515/cppm-2024-0023
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85200218341&doi=10.1515%2fcppm-2024-0023&partnerID=40&md5=dfd7f32b89c5cbf725940a9f308016b9
description A multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to produce a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is applied to address these two problems: increasing conversion and reducing operating cost (as the first optimization problem, P1) and increasing productivity and reducing operating cost (as the second optimization problem, P2). ASPEN Plus software was utilized for the model-based optimization by executing the MOO algorithm using the tubular reactor model. The multi-objective optimization of multi-objective Bonobo optimisers (MOBO-I, MOBO-II and MOBO-III) are utilised to solve the optimization problem. The performance matrices, including hypervolume, pure diversity, and distance, are used to decide on the best MOO method. An inequality constraint was introduced on the temperature of the reactor to prevent run-away. According to the findings of the study, the MOBO-II for Problems 1 and 2 was the most effective MOO strategy. The reason is that the solution set found represents the most accurate, diversified, and acceptable distribution points alongside the Pareto Front (PF) in terms of homogeneity. The minimum operating cost, the maximum conversion and productivity obtained by MOBO-II are Mil. RM/year 114.3, 31.45 %, Mil. RM/year 545.3, respectively. © 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
issn 19342659
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871794561908736