Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps

Current literatures of active learning widely address pedagogies/approaches and their outcomes, but it does not appear to be a pedagogical consensus regarding the active learning pedagogies/approaches. This situation makes it difficult to gauge the prevalence and practicability of active learning pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
Main Author: Leow M.H.; Hassan N.; Mohd Sharizal S.A.; Razak R.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197310501&doi=10.11591%2fijere.v13i3.26877&partnerID=40&md5=232f57786fff70bff7ea67bed77bfa53
id 2-s2.0-85197310501
spelling 2-s2.0-85197310501
Leow M.H.; Hassan N.; Mohd Sharizal S.A.; Razak R.A.
Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
2024
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
13
3
10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26877
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197310501&doi=10.11591%2fijere.v13i3.26877&partnerID=40&md5=232f57786fff70bff7ea67bed77bfa53
Current literatures of active learning widely address pedagogies/approaches and their outcomes, but it does not appear to be a pedagogical consensus regarding the active learning pedagogies/approaches. This situation makes it difficult to gauge the prevalence and practicability of active learning pedagogies/approaches in specific educational levels. This systematic review is aimed to find the consensus of active learning pedagogies/approaches applied in pre-school to tertiary education on the basis of constructivist philosophy and student-centered notion, determine the desirable pedagogical dimensions, discover pedagogical gaps, and offer attention for bridging the gaps. We located seven pedagogical dimensions from teachers’ perspectives of pedagogical features, in terms of pedagogies/approaches and theories/concepts, from 148 publications that were eligible for inclusion after filtered through PRISMA. The learning outcomes or evidence of effectiveness were determined across various pedagogies/approaches in relation to pedagogical dimensions’ manifestation. Content analysis was employed in this work to encode, categorize, and develop themes. As a result, this study highlights the pedagogical gaps between desirable pedagogical dimensions’ manifestation and actual pedagogy attainment at various educational levels and provides suggestion for bridging the gaps to ensure smooth pedagogical transition. The study may serve as a foundation for future active learning pedagogical designs and enrich student-centered learning initiatives. © 2024, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
22528822
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Leow M.H.; Hassan N.; Mohd Sharizal S.A.; Razak R.A.
spellingShingle Leow M.H.; Hassan N.; Mohd Sharizal S.A.; Razak R.A.
Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
author_facet Leow M.H.; Hassan N.; Mohd Sharizal S.A.; Razak R.A.
author_sort Leow M.H.; Hassan N.; Mohd Sharizal S.A.; Razak R.A.
title Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
title_short Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
title_full Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
title_fullStr Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
title_full_unstemmed Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
title_sort Active learning pedagogical dimensions: discovering and bridging the pedagogical gaps
publishDate 2024
container_title International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
container_volume 13
container_issue 3
doi_str_mv 10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26877
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197310501&doi=10.11591%2fijere.v13i3.26877&partnerID=40&md5=232f57786fff70bff7ea67bed77bfa53
description Current literatures of active learning widely address pedagogies/approaches and their outcomes, but it does not appear to be a pedagogical consensus regarding the active learning pedagogies/approaches. This situation makes it difficult to gauge the prevalence and practicability of active learning pedagogies/approaches in specific educational levels. This systematic review is aimed to find the consensus of active learning pedagogies/approaches applied in pre-school to tertiary education on the basis of constructivist philosophy and student-centered notion, determine the desirable pedagogical dimensions, discover pedagogical gaps, and offer attention for bridging the gaps. We located seven pedagogical dimensions from teachers’ perspectives of pedagogical features, in terms of pedagogies/approaches and theories/concepts, from 148 publications that were eligible for inclusion after filtered through PRISMA. The learning outcomes or evidence of effectiveness were determined across various pedagogies/approaches in relation to pedagogical dimensions’ manifestation. Content analysis was employed in this work to encode, categorize, and develop themes. As a result, this study highlights the pedagogical gaps between desirable pedagogical dimensions’ manifestation and actual pedagogy attainment at various educational levels and provides suggestion for bridging the gaps to ensure smooth pedagogical transition. The study may serve as a foundation for future active learning pedagogical designs and enrich student-centered learning initiatives. © 2024, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
issn 22528822
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1818940552184332288