Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms
The multiple intelligence (MI) theory suggests that students learn in different ways based on their intelligence strengths, thus, proposes teachers employ a variety of intelligences to engage students in the teaching and learning process. This study explores the application of MI in the Malaysian En...
Published in: | International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
2024
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197145275&doi=10.11591%2fijere.v13i4.27797&partnerID=40&md5=613477fd41766448c02b08e7fa82dc33 |
id |
2-s2.0-85197145275 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85197145275 Ariffin K.; Husin M.S.; de Mello G.; Ibrahim M.N.A.; Omar N.H.; Ishak N. Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms 2024 International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 13 4 10.11591/ijere.v13i4.27797 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197145275&doi=10.11591%2fijere.v13i4.27797&partnerID=40&md5=613477fd41766448c02b08e7fa82dc33 The multiple intelligence (MI) theory suggests that students learn in different ways based on their intelligence strengths, thus, proposes teachers employ a variety of intelligences to engage students in the teaching and learning process. This study explores the application of MI in the Malaysian English as second language (ESL) classrooms and the extent to which teachers provide instructions that meet the needs of the students in the classroom. Data were procured from a survey questionnaire that gauged teachers’ teaching activities in ESL classrooms under Gardner’s eight constructs of MI: linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, interpersonal, intrapersonal, bodily-kinesthetic, naturalist, and musical. Descriptive statistics using mean score and independent sample t-test was employed in the data analysis procedures. The findings reveal that only 58% of the teachers had knowledge of the MI theory, with only 12% having received formal pedagogical training on MI. In addition, the eight intelligences were not practiced equally. Interpersonal, linguistic, intrapersonal, and spatial intelligences seemed to be the most common strategies employed by teachers in their teaching as these MI are usually measured in the standardized tests while naturalistic and musical intelligences were the least frequently integrated as they are not included in the assessment scale in ESL. Such findings have significant pedagogical implications as classroom teachers should acknowledge the different levels of strengths and motivations in learning among the students. The study highlights the need to provide teachers with training and integrating personalized learning, utilizing students’ strong aspects, and employing a variety of teaching methods in the classroom. © 2024, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 22528822 English Article All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
author |
Ariffin K.; Husin M.S.; de Mello G.; Ibrahim M.N.A.; Omar N.H.; Ishak N. |
spellingShingle |
Ariffin K.; Husin M.S.; de Mello G.; Ibrahim M.N.A.; Omar N.H.; Ishak N. Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms |
author_facet |
Ariffin K.; Husin M.S.; de Mello G.; Ibrahim M.N.A.; Omar N.H.; Ishak N. |
author_sort |
Ariffin K.; Husin M.S.; de Mello G.; Ibrahim M.N.A.; Omar N.H.; Ishak N. |
title |
Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms |
title_short |
Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms |
title_full |
Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms |
title_fullStr |
Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms |
title_sort |
Meeting students’ needs: teachers’ practice of multiple intelligences in English as second language classrooms |
publishDate |
2024 |
container_title |
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education |
container_volume |
13 |
container_issue |
4 |
doi_str_mv |
10.11591/ijere.v13i4.27797 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197145275&doi=10.11591%2fijere.v13i4.27797&partnerID=40&md5=613477fd41766448c02b08e7fa82dc33 |
description |
The multiple intelligence (MI) theory suggests that students learn in different ways based on their intelligence strengths, thus, proposes teachers employ a variety of intelligences to engage students in the teaching and learning process. This study explores the application of MI in the Malaysian English as second language (ESL) classrooms and the extent to which teachers provide instructions that meet the needs of the students in the classroom. Data were procured from a survey questionnaire that gauged teachers’ teaching activities in ESL classrooms under Gardner’s eight constructs of MI: linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, interpersonal, intrapersonal, bodily-kinesthetic, naturalist, and musical. Descriptive statistics using mean score and independent sample t-test was employed in the data analysis procedures. The findings reveal that only 58% of the teachers had knowledge of the MI theory, with only 12% having received formal pedagogical training on MI. In addition, the eight intelligences were not practiced equally. Interpersonal, linguistic, intrapersonal, and spatial intelligences seemed to be the most common strategies employed by teachers in their teaching as these MI are usually measured in the standardized tests while naturalistic and musical intelligences were the least frequently integrated as they are not included in the assessment scale in ESL. Such findings have significant pedagogical implications as classroom teachers should acknowledge the different levels of strengths and motivations in learning among the students. The study highlights the need to provide teachers with training and integrating personalized learning, utilizing students’ strong aspects, and employing a variety of teaching methods in the classroom. © 2024, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. |
publisher |
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science |
issn |
22528822 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1812871794364776448 |