FEASIBILITY OF THE NEWLY DEVELOPED INDEX FOR INTERCEPTIVE ORTHODONTICS REFERRAL (IIOR) AND THE USER’S PERCEPTION: A PILOT STUDY

Introduction: The Index for Interceptive Orthodontics Referral (IIOR), a tool designed to guide the timely referral of developing malocclusion was recently developed and validated. The IIOR may facilitate the timely identification and referral of cases that may benefit from interceptive orthodontics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Health and Translational Medicine
Main Author: Nordin N.; Sinniah S.D.; Venkiteswaran A.; Abdullah N.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188899893&doi=10.22452%2fjummec.sp2024no1.23&partnerID=40&md5=5c9a34e99104af2e647282e93e6ee548
Description
Summary:Introduction: The Index for Interceptive Orthodontics Referral (IIOR), a tool designed to guide the timely referral of developing malocclusion was recently developed and validated. The IIOR may facilitate the timely identification and referral of cases that may benefit from interceptive orthodontics. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of the IIOR and perception among its users. Objectives: (1) To assess the feasibility of using IIOR among dental frontliners. (2) To investigate the perception of IIOR usage among dental frontliners. Methodology: Thirteen participants (6 dental officers, 3 orthodontic postgraduate students, and 4 dental therapists) were briefed about the IIOR through a pre-recorded video presentation. Subsequently, the participants were asked to grade 10 study models with a case summary of each, using the IIOR. The participants' responses were compared to the grading by experts on the 10 study models of various malocclusion using IIOR, which was established before this pilot study. After grading, they were asked to complete a questionnaire that assessed their perception towards the IIOR, in an interactive method. The questionnaire had undergone content and face validation. Results: The Fleiss Kappa scoring by the participants resulted in moderate agreement of 0.5. A total of 79.23% of participants matched the gold standard scoring. Additionally, 92.3% of the participants were happy to have a screening tool such as the IIOR to guide and assist them during patient screening. They found IIOR to be very useful, efficient, and easy to understand. Conclusions: In this pilot study, the IIOR was found to be feasible to use and was highly accepted by the dental frontliners. The IIOR was found to be simple and convenient to use by the dental frontliners during dental screening. © 2024, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya. All rights reserved.
ISSN:18237339
DOI:10.22452/jummec.sp2024no1.23