A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China

Government response to building calamities using certain approaches depends on the types of building failures. Such approaches are the Periodic Building Inspection (PBI) in Malaysia and the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong. Both statutory requirements are meant to maintain th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology
Main Author: Sarkom Y.; Ghani M.Z.A.; Ariff N.R.M.; Jalil M.K.A.; Kenawy I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTHM 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85185316220&doi=10.30880%2fijscet.2023.14.05.022&partnerID=40&md5=429e6764efdf1446abfbc7354cad1194
id 2-s2.0-85185316220
spelling 2-s2.0-85185316220
Sarkom Y.; Ghani M.Z.A.; Ariff N.R.M.; Jalil M.K.A.; Kenawy I.
A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
2023
International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology
14
5 Special Issue
10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.022
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85185316220&doi=10.30880%2fijscet.2023.14.05.022&partnerID=40&md5=429e6764efdf1446abfbc7354cad1194
Government response to building calamities using certain approaches depends on the types of building failures. Such approaches are the Periodic Building Inspection (PBI) in Malaysia and the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong. Both statutory requirements are meant to maintain the safety and structural integrity of buildings, and MBIS is selected for comparison with PBI because of the many parallelisms between the applications of both laws. Since it was made a statutory requirement in 1994, studies have found that PBI implementation by various local authorities in the Klang Valley region, Malaysia was insufficient. Comparing both statutory requirements offer insight and understanding into the compliance issues and solutions, therefore, benefiting the PBI from the proposed improvements. To achieve the aforementioned goal, the following objectives are proposed: a) To compare both statutory periodic building inspections; b) To identify gaps and best practices in both statutory periodic building inspections; and c) To propose improvements for PBI implementation. This research involves data gathering and comparative reviews of prior studies on PBI and MBIS. The study's outcomes suggest significant similarities in the challenges faced during the implementation of both statutory periodic inspections. These challenges encompass unclear legal procedures, insufficient government participation, and weak enforcement. Building owners in both localities also encounter hurdles related to financial limitations, gaining consensus from residents, and selecting suitable engineers. Hong Kong's targeted inspection using a risk-based approach priority can be emulated by local authorities in Malaysia. Hong Kong's approach of allowing other qualified professionals like registered architects and building surveyors to perform initial visual inspections could also be applied in Malaysia. KPKT should consider providing financial support to low cost building owners, similar to the initiatives of the Hong Kong Housing Society (HKHS) and Urban Renewal Authority (URA). Local authorities and KPKT need to refine their service delivery through improved inter-departmental collaboration and heightened engagement with building owners. Revisions to Act 133, mirroring enforcement methods in Hong Kong, would be beneficial. Additionally, efforts should be made to raise public awareness about the significance of conducting PBI. © Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Publisher’s Office.
Penerbit UTHM
21803242
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Sarkom Y.; Ghani M.Z.A.; Ariff N.R.M.; Jalil M.K.A.; Kenawy I.
spellingShingle Sarkom Y.; Ghani M.Z.A.; Ariff N.R.M.; Jalil M.K.A.; Kenawy I.
A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
author_facet Sarkom Y.; Ghani M.Z.A.; Ariff N.R.M.; Jalil M.K.A.; Kenawy I.
author_sort Sarkom Y.; Ghani M.Z.A.; Ariff N.R.M.; Jalil M.K.A.; Kenawy I.
title A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
title_short A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
title_full A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
title_fullStr A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
title_sort A Comparative Review of the Statutory Periodic Building Inspection Implementation in the Klang Valley Region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China
publishDate 2023
container_title International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology
container_volume 14
container_issue 5 Special Issue
doi_str_mv 10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.022
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85185316220&doi=10.30880%2fijscet.2023.14.05.022&partnerID=40&md5=429e6764efdf1446abfbc7354cad1194
description Government response to building calamities using certain approaches depends on the types of building failures. Such approaches are the Periodic Building Inspection (PBI) in Malaysia and the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong. Both statutory requirements are meant to maintain the safety and structural integrity of buildings, and MBIS is selected for comparison with PBI because of the many parallelisms between the applications of both laws. Since it was made a statutory requirement in 1994, studies have found that PBI implementation by various local authorities in the Klang Valley region, Malaysia was insufficient. Comparing both statutory requirements offer insight and understanding into the compliance issues and solutions, therefore, benefiting the PBI from the proposed improvements. To achieve the aforementioned goal, the following objectives are proposed: a) To compare both statutory periodic building inspections; b) To identify gaps and best practices in both statutory periodic building inspections; and c) To propose improvements for PBI implementation. This research involves data gathering and comparative reviews of prior studies on PBI and MBIS. The study's outcomes suggest significant similarities in the challenges faced during the implementation of both statutory periodic inspections. These challenges encompass unclear legal procedures, insufficient government participation, and weak enforcement. Building owners in both localities also encounter hurdles related to financial limitations, gaining consensus from residents, and selecting suitable engineers. Hong Kong's targeted inspection using a risk-based approach priority can be emulated by local authorities in Malaysia. Hong Kong's approach of allowing other qualified professionals like registered architects and building surveyors to perform initial visual inspections could also be applied in Malaysia. KPKT should consider providing financial support to low cost building owners, similar to the initiatives of the Hong Kong Housing Society (HKHS) and Urban Renewal Authority (URA). Local authorities and KPKT need to refine their service delivery through improved inter-departmental collaboration and heightened engagement with building owners. Revisions to Act 133, mirroring enforcement methods in Hong Kong, would be beneficial. Additionally, efforts should be made to raise public awareness about the significance of conducting PBI. © Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Publisher’s Office.
publisher Penerbit UTHM
issn 21803242
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678476269060096