Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis

Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can potentially contribute to optimizing energy and exergy outputs in renewable resources to increase efficiencies and reduce environmental risk. This study utilized tree-based, linear, and non-linear regression techniques to predict the energy and exergy effi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cleaner Production
Main Author: Tao H.; Alawi O.A.; Homod R.Z.; Mohammed M.K.; Goliatt L.; Togun H.; Shafik S.S.; Heddam S.; Yaseen Z.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184994418&doi=10.1016%2fj.jclepro.2024.141069&partnerID=40&md5=0c531e58f2d1f0284a380eaf19f5995b
id 2-s2.0-85184994418
spelling 2-s2.0-85184994418
Tao H.; Alawi O.A.; Homod R.Z.; Mohammed M.K.; Goliatt L.; Togun H.; Shafik S.S.; Heddam S.; Yaseen Z.M.
Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
2024
Journal of Cleaner Production
443

10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141069
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184994418&doi=10.1016%2fj.jclepro.2024.141069&partnerID=40&md5=0c531e58f2d1f0284a380eaf19f5995b
Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can potentially contribute to optimizing energy and exergy outputs in renewable resources to increase efficiencies and reduce environmental risk. This study utilized tree-based, linear, and non-linear regression techniques to predict the energy and exergy efficiency of Parabolic Trough Solar Collectors (PTSCs) using oil-based nanofluids. The cooling fluids were prepared from three main oil types, namely Therminol VP-1, Syltherm 800, and Dowtherm Q mixed with three metallic oxides, including Al2O3, CuO, and SiO2, in various volume fractions. The two outputs were predicted according to a range of input parameters, namely Volume Fraction (%), Reynolds Number (Re), Inlet Fluid Temperature, Direct Solar Irradiance, Nusselt Number (Nu), and Friction Factor (f). Ensemble approaches such as Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) were the top-performing models in the model selection process out of nine. The modeling results showed that, CART was the top model in predicting the energy efficiency using Syltherm 800-SiO2 nanofluid with R2 = 0.9999. Meanwhile, ETR was the top model in predicting the exergy efficiency using Dowtherm Q-SiO2 nanofluid with R2 = 0.9988. Moreover, in the business insights, the maximum errors in the energy and exergy models were observed (1.43 % and 1.97 %) using Therminol VP-1, (1.3 % and 2.44 %) using Syltherm 800 and Syltherm 800-CuO and (1.15 % and 2 %) using Dowtherm Q and Dowtherm Q-CuO, respectively. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Ltd
9596526
English
Article

author Tao H.; Alawi O.A.; Homod R.Z.; Mohammed M.K.; Goliatt L.; Togun H.; Shafik S.S.; Heddam S.; Yaseen Z.M.
spellingShingle Tao H.; Alawi O.A.; Homod R.Z.; Mohammed M.K.; Goliatt L.; Togun H.; Shafik S.S.; Heddam S.; Yaseen Z.M.
Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
author_facet Tao H.; Alawi O.A.; Homod R.Z.; Mohammed M.K.; Goliatt L.; Togun H.; Shafik S.S.; Heddam S.; Yaseen Z.M.
author_sort Tao H.; Alawi O.A.; Homod R.Z.; Mohammed M.K.; Goliatt L.; Togun H.; Shafik S.S.; Heddam S.; Yaseen Z.M.
title Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
title_short Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
title_full Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
title_fullStr Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
title_full_unstemmed Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
title_sort Data driven insights for parabolic trough solar collectors: Artificial intelligence-based energy and exergy performance analysis
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Cleaner Production
container_volume 443
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141069
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184994418&doi=10.1016%2fj.jclepro.2024.141069&partnerID=40&md5=0c531e58f2d1f0284a380eaf19f5995b
description Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can potentially contribute to optimizing energy and exergy outputs in renewable resources to increase efficiencies and reduce environmental risk. This study utilized tree-based, linear, and non-linear regression techniques to predict the energy and exergy efficiency of Parabolic Trough Solar Collectors (PTSCs) using oil-based nanofluids. The cooling fluids were prepared from three main oil types, namely Therminol VP-1, Syltherm 800, and Dowtherm Q mixed with three metallic oxides, including Al2O3, CuO, and SiO2, in various volume fractions. The two outputs were predicted according to a range of input parameters, namely Volume Fraction (%), Reynolds Number (Re), Inlet Fluid Temperature, Direct Solar Irradiance, Nusselt Number (Nu), and Friction Factor (f). Ensemble approaches such as Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) were the top-performing models in the model selection process out of nine. The modeling results showed that, CART was the top model in predicting the energy efficiency using Syltherm 800-SiO2 nanofluid with R2 = 0.9999. Meanwhile, ETR was the top model in predicting the exergy efficiency using Dowtherm Q-SiO2 nanofluid with R2 = 0.9988. Moreover, in the business insights, the maximum errors in the energy and exergy models were observed (1.43 % and 1.97 %) using Therminol VP-1, (1.3 % and 2.44 %) using Syltherm 800 and Syltherm 800-CuO and (1.15 % and 2 %) using Dowtherm Q and Dowtherm Q-CuO, respectively. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
publisher Elsevier Ltd
issn 9596526
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678009811075072