Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Under-utilisation of immunisation services remains a public health challenge. Pharmacists act as facilitators and increasingly as immunisers, yet relatively little robust evidence exists of the impact elicited on patient health outcome and vaccination uptake. Objective: To evaluate the i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Main Author: Rahim M.H.A.; Dom S.H.M.; Hamzah M.S.R.; Azman S.H.; Zaharuddin Z.; Fahrni M.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184412587&doi=10.1080%2f20523211.2023.2285955&partnerID=40&md5=1c79c039950f896ca6b27e83638238f6
id 2-s2.0-85184412587
spelling 2-s2.0-85184412587
Rahim M.H.A.; Dom S.H.M.; Hamzah M.S.R.; Azman S.H.; Zaharuddin Z.; Fahrni M.L.
Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2024
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
17
1
10.1080/20523211.2023.2285955
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184412587&doi=10.1080%2f20523211.2023.2285955&partnerID=40&md5=1c79c039950f896ca6b27e83638238f6
Background: Under-utilisation of immunisation services remains a public health challenge. Pharmacists act as facilitators and increasingly as immunisers, yet relatively little robust evidence exists of the impact elicited on patient health outcome and vaccination uptake. Objective: To evaluate the influence of pharmacist interventions on public vaccination rate. Methods: SCOPUS, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 2023 to retrieve non- and randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Studies were excluded if no comparator group to pharmacist involvement was reported. Data extraction, risk of bias assessments, and meta-analyses using random-effect models, were performed. Results: Four RCTs and 15 non-RCTs, encompassing influenza, pneumococcal, herpes zoster, and tetanus-diphtheria and pertussis vaccine types, and administered in diverse settings including community pharmacies, were included. Pooled effect sizes revealed that, as compared to usual care, pharmacists, regardless of their intervention, improved the overall immunisation uptake by up to 51% [RR 1.51 (1.28, 1.77)] while immunisation frequency doubled when pharmacists acted specifically as advocators [RR 2.09 (1.42, 3.07)]. Conclusion: While the evidence for pharmacist immunisers was mixed, their contribution to immunisation programmes boosted public vaccination rate. Pharmacists demonstrated leadership and acquired indispensable advocator roles in the community and hospital settings. Future research could explore the depth of engagement and hence the extent of influence on immunisation uptake. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
BioMed Central Ltd
20523211
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Rahim M.H.A.; Dom S.H.M.; Hamzah M.S.R.; Azman S.H.; Zaharuddin Z.; Fahrni M.L.
spellingShingle Rahim M.H.A.; Dom S.H.M.; Hamzah M.S.R.; Azman S.H.; Zaharuddin Z.; Fahrni M.L.
Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author_facet Rahim M.H.A.; Dom S.H.M.; Hamzah M.S.R.; Azman S.H.; Zaharuddin Z.; Fahrni M.L.
author_sort Rahim M.H.A.; Dom S.H.M.; Hamzah M.S.R.; Azman S.H.; Zaharuddin Z.; Fahrni M.L.
title Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Impact of pharmacist interventions on immunisation uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
container_volume 17
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1080/20523211.2023.2285955
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184412587&doi=10.1080%2f20523211.2023.2285955&partnerID=40&md5=1c79c039950f896ca6b27e83638238f6
description Background: Under-utilisation of immunisation services remains a public health challenge. Pharmacists act as facilitators and increasingly as immunisers, yet relatively little robust evidence exists of the impact elicited on patient health outcome and vaccination uptake. Objective: To evaluate the influence of pharmacist interventions on public vaccination rate. Methods: SCOPUS, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 2023 to retrieve non- and randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Studies were excluded if no comparator group to pharmacist involvement was reported. Data extraction, risk of bias assessments, and meta-analyses using random-effect models, were performed. Results: Four RCTs and 15 non-RCTs, encompassing influenza, pneumococcal, herpes zoster, and tetanus-diphtheria and pertussis vaccine types, and administered in diverse settings including community pharmacies, were included. Pooled effect sizes revealed that, as compared to usual care, pharmacists, regardless of their intervention, improved the overall immunisation uptake by up to 51% [RR 1.51 (1.28, 1.77)] while immunisation frequency doubled when pharmacists acted specifically as advocators [RR 2.09 (1.42, 3.07)]. Conclusion: While the evidence for pharmacist immunisers was mixed, their contribution to immunisation programmes boosted public vaccination rate. Pharmacists demonstrated leadership and acquired indispensable advocator roles in the community and hospital settings. Future research could explore the depth of engagement and hence the extent of influence on immunisation uptake. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
publisher BioMed Central Ltd
issn 20523211
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677886067572736