Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: There is limited evidence of financial toxicity (FT) among cancer patients from countries of various income levels. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of objective and subjective FT and their measurements in relation to cancer treatment. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Public Health
Main Author: Azzani M.; Atroosh W.M.; Anbazhagan D.; Kumarasamy V.; Abdalla M.M.I.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85182498717&doi=10.3389%2ffpubh.2023.1266533&partnerID=40&md5=b887264a9aaf022c764fbfdb13082a39
id 2-s2.0-85182498717
spelling 2-s2.0-85182498717
Azzani M.; Atroosh W.M.; Anbazhagan D.; Kumarasamy V.; Abdalla M.M.I.
Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2023
Frontiers in Public Health
11

10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266533
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85182498717&doi=10.3389%2ffpubh.2023.1266533&partnerID=40&md5=b887264a9aaf022c764fbfdb13082a39
Background: There is limited evidence of financial toxicity (FT) among cancer patients from countries of various income levels. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of objective and subjective FT and their measurements in relation to cancer treatment. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched to find studies that examined FT. There was no limit on the design or setting of the study. Random-effects meta-analysis was utilized to obtain the pooled prevalence of objective FT. Results: Out of 244 identified studies during the initial screening, only 64 studies were included in this review. The catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) method was often used in the included studies to determine the objective FT. The pooled prevalence of CHE was 47% (95% CI: 24.0–70.0) in middle- and high-income countries, and the highest percentage was noted in low-income countries (74.4%). A total of 30 studies focused on subjective FT, of which 9 used the Comprehensive Score for FT (COST) tool and reported median scores ranging between 17.0 and 31.9. Conclusion: This study shows that cancer patients from various income-group countries experienced a significant financial burden during their treatment. It is imperative to conduct further studies on interventions and policies that can lower FT caused by cancer treatment. Copyright © 2024 Azzani, Atroosh, Anbazhagan, Kumarasamy and Abdalla.
Frontiers Media SA
22962565
English
Review
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
author Azzani M.; Atroosh W.M.; Anbazhagan D.; Kumarasamy V.; Abdalla M.M.I.
spellingShingle Azzani M.; Atroosh W.M.; Anbazhagan D.; Kumarasamy V.; Abdalla M.M.I.
Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author_facet Azzani M.; Atroosh W.M.; Anbazhagan D.; Kumarasamy V.; Abdalla M.M.I.
author_sort Azzani M.; Atroosh W.M.; Anbazhagan D.; Kumarasamy V.; Abdalla M.M.I.
title Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Describing financial toxicity among cancer patients in different income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publishDate 2023
container_title Frontiers in Public Health
container_volume 11
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266533
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85182498717&doi=10.3389%2ffpubh.2023.1266533&partnerID=40&md5=b887264a9aaf022c764fbfdb13082a39
description Background: There is limited evidence of financial toxicity (FT) among cancer patients from countries of various income levels. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of objective and subjective FT and their measurements in relation to cancer treatment. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched to find studies that examined FT. There was no limit on the design or setting of the study. Random-effects meta-analysis was utilized to obtain the pooled prevalence of objective FT. Results: Out of 244 identified studies during the initial screening, only 64 studies were included in this review. The catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) method was often used in the included studies to determine the objective FT. The pooled prevalence of CHE was 47% (95% CI: 24.0–70.0) in middle- and high-income countries, and the highest percentage was noted in low-income countries (74.4%). A total of 30 studies focused on subjective FT, of which 9 used the Comprehensive Score for FT (COST) tool and reported median scores ranging between 17.0 and 31.9. Conclusion: This study shows that cancer patients from various income-group countries experienced a significant financial burden during their treatment. It is imperative to conduct further studies on interventions and policies that can lower FT caused by cancer treatment. Copyright © 2024 Azzani, Atroosh, Anbazhagan, Kumarasamy and Abdalla.
publisher Frontiers Media SA
issn 22962565
language English
format Review
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677682850398208