Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
Over the years, numerous maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods have been developed to extract the maximum available power from PV arrays. They are generally categorized as conventional or metaheuristic methods. The most employed conventional methods include perturb and observe (P&O), hill...
Published in: | International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
2023
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180645189&doi=10.11591%2fijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513&partnerID=40&md5=6e60bf332331c90730d36a4c7a236784 |
id |
2-s2.0-85180645189 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85180645189 Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B. Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review 2023 International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems 14 4 10.11591/ijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180645189&doi=10.11591%2fijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513&partnerID=40&md5=6e60bf332331c90730d36a4c7a236784 Over the years, numerous maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods have been developed to extract the maximum available power from PV arrays. They are generally categorized as conventional or metaheuristic methods. The most employed conventional methods include perturb and observe (P&O), hill climbing (HC), and incremental conductance (INC), due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, under partial shading condition (PSC), none of them can effectively locate a global maximum power point (GMPP) out of many local maximum power points (LMPPs). This results in significant power loss during PSC, prompting the development of various metaheuristic-based MPPT methods to address the problem. This paper reviews 38 existing metaheuristic-based MPPTs and 27 metaheuristic methods that have not yet been applied to any MPPT operation up to date. Metaphorically, these methods are divided into four categories: i) evolutionary-based, ii) physics-based, iii) swarm-based, and iv) human-based. The different MPPTs are compared in terms of complexity, converter topology, and PSC tracking capability. This paper is intended to serve as a one-stop resource for any researcher, practitioner, or advanced student seeking to develop a new metaheuristic-based MPPT method. © 2023, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 20888694 English Article All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
author |
Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B. |
spellingShingle |
Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B. Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review |
author_facet |
Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B. |
author_sort |
Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B. |
title |
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review |
title_short |
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review |
title_full |
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review |
title_fullStr |
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review |
title_sort |
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review |
publishDate |
2023 |
container_title |
International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems |
container_volume |
14 |
container_issue |
4 |
doi_str_mv |
10.11591/ijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180645189&doi=10.11591%2fijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513&partnerID=40&md5=6e60bf332331c90730d36a4c7a236784 |
description |
Over the years, numerous maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods have been developed to extract the maximum available power from PV arrays. They are generally categorized as conventional or metaheuristic methods. The most employed conventional methods include perturb and observe (P&O), hill climbing (HC), and incremental conductance (INC), due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, under partial shading condition (PSC), none of them can effectively locate a global maximum power point (GMPP) out of many local maximum power points (LMPPs). This results in significant power loss during PSC, prompting the development of various metaheuristic-based MPPT methods to address the problem. This paper reviews 38 existing metaheuristic-based MPPTs and 27 metaheuristic methods that have not yet been applied to any MPPT operation up to date. Metaphorically, these methods are divided into four categories: i) evolutionary-based, ii) physics-based, iii) swarm-based, and iv) human-based. The different MPPTs are compared in terms of complexity, converter topology, and PSC tracking capability. This paper is intended to serve as a one-stop resource for any researcher, practitioner, or advanced student seeking to develop a new metaheuristic-based MPPT method. © 2023, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. |
publisher |
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science |
issn |
20888694 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809677578559029248 |