Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review

Over the years, numerous maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods have been developed to extract the maximum available power from PV arrays. They are generally categorized as conventional or metaheuristic methods. The most employed conventional methods include perturb and observe (P&O), hill...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems
Main Author: Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180645189&doi=10.11591%2fijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513&partnerID=40&md5=6e60bf332331c90730d36a4c7a236784
id 2-s2.0-85180645189
spelling 2-s2.0-85180645189
Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B.
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
2023
International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems
14
4
10.11591/ijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180645189&doi=10.11591%2fijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513&partnerID=40&md5=6e60bf332331c90730d36a4c7a236784
Over the years, numerous maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods have been developed to extract the maximum available power from PV arrays. They are generally categorized as conventional or metaheuristic methods. The most employed conventional methods include perturb and observe (P&O), hill climbing (HC), and incremental conductance (INC), due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, under partial shading condition (PSC), none of them can effectively locate a global maximum power point (GMPP) out of many local maximum power points (LMPPs). This results in significant power loss during PSC, prompting the development of various metaheuristic-based MPPT methods to address the problem. This paper reviews 38 existing metaheuristic-based MPPTs and 27 metaheuristic methods that have not yet been applied to any MPPT operation up to date. Metaphorically, these methods are divided into four categories: i) evolutionary-based, ii) physics-based, iii) swarm-based, and iv) human-based. The different MPPTs are compared in terms of complexity, converter topology, and PSC tracking capability. This paper is intended to serve as a one-stop resource for any researcher, practitioner, or advanced student seeking to develop a new metaheuristic-based MPPT method. © 2023, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
20888694
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B.
spellingShingle Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B.
Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
author_facet Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B.
author_sort Jamhari M.K.A.M.; Hashim N.; Othman M.M.; Abidin A.F.B.
title Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
title_short Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
title_full Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
title_fullStr Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
title_full_unstemmed Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
title_sort Metaheuristics-based maximum power point tracking for PV systems: a review
publishDate 2023
container_title International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems
container_volume 14
container_issue 4
doi_str_mv 10.11591/ijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180645189&doi=10.11591%2fijpeds.v14.i4.pp2495-2513&partnerID=40&md5=6e60bf332331c90730d36a4c7a236784
description Over the years, numerous maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods have been developed to extract the maximum available power from PV arrays. They are generally categorized as conventional or metaheuristic methods. The most employed conventional methods include perturb and observe (P&O), hill climbing (HC), and incremental conductance (INC), due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, under partial shading condition (PSC), none of them can effectively locate a global maximum power point (GMPP) out of many local maximum power points (LMPPs). This results in significant power loss during PSC, prompting the development of various metaheuristic-based MPPT methods to address the problem. This paper reviews 38 existing metaheuristic-based MPPTs and 27 metaheuristic methods that have not yet been applied to any MPPT operation up to date. Metaphorically, these methods are divided into four categories: i) evolutionary-based, ii) physics-based, iii) swarm-based, and iv) human-based. The different MPPTs are compared in terms of complexity, converter topology, and PSC tracking capability. This paper is intended to serve as a one-stop resource for any researcher, practitioner, or advanced student seeking to develop a new metaheuristic-based MPPT method. © 2023, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
issn 20888694
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677578559029248