Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire

Introduction: Many students struggle to recognise their own learning styles, which leads to poor academic achievement. Thus, this study aimed to determine the preferred learning styles of undergraduate pharmacy students at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Selangor Puncak Ala...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences
Main Author: Jailani N.E.W.; Suratman S.; Maniam S.; Ali A.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180595123&doi=10.47836%2fmjmhs.19.s12.2&partnerID=40&md5=3b630e26a4e0742d0c310be9c0f49618
id 2-s2.0-85180595123
spelling 2-s2.0-85180595123
Jailani N.E.W.; Suratman S.; Maniam S.; Ali A.A.
Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
2023
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences
19

10.47836/mjmhs.19.s12.2
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180595123&doi=10.47836%2fmjmhs.19.s12.2&partnerID=40&md5=3b630e26a4e0742d0c310be9c0f49618
Introduction: Many students struggle to recognise their own learning styles, which leads to poor academic achievement. Thus, this study aimed to determine the preferred learning styles of undergraduate pharmacy students at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Selangor Puncak Alam Campus. The correlation between the preferred learning style of pharmacy students and their gender, year of study, and academic performance was also investigated in this study. Methods: Respondents (N = 258) were recruited using simple random sampling from four cohort of pharmacy students. The learning style was evaluated by using a validated Visual, Aural, Reading/writing, and Kinesthetic (VARK) Questionnaire. Results: In this study, unimodal learning style was preferred by 65.1% of the respondents, with the remaining 34.9% having multimodal style preference. Kinesthetic (K) was the most preferred learning style (37.6%) while Reading/writing (R) was the least preferred method of learning (33.7%). The Chi-square test of independence revealed that there was a significant correlation between gender and the preferred learning style (p = 0.002). However, no correlation was observed in the preferred modality according to the year of study (p = 0.877) and academic performance (p = 0.989). Conclusion: In conclusion, the majority of our pharmacy students were unimodal learners, with the kinesthetic learning style being the most common and reading/writing being the least preferred. Our pharmacy students have also been discovered to be multimodal learners, which may be an important consideration for educators utilising a mixed teaching technique to support various learning styles. © 2023 UPM Press. All rights reserved.
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
16758544
English
Article
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
author Jailani N.E.W.; Suratman S.; Maniam S.; Ali A.A.
spellingShingle Jailani N.E.W.; Suratman S.; Maniam S.; Ali A.A.
Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
author_facet Jailani N.E.W.; Suratman S.; Maniam S.; Ali A.A.
author_sort Jailani N.E.W.; Suratman S.; Maniam S.; Ali A.A.
title Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
title_short Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
title_full Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
title_fullStr Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
title_sort Assessment of Undergraduate Pharmacy Student Learning Styles Using the VARK Questionnaire
publishDate 2023
container_title Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences
container_volume 19
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.47836/mjmhs.19.s12.2
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180595123&doi=10.47836%2fmjmhs.19.s12.2&partnerID=40&md5=3b630e26a4e0742d0c310be9c0f49618
description Introduction: Many students struggle to recognise their own learning styles, which leads to poor academic achievement. Thus, this study aimed to determine the preferred learning styles of undergraduate pharmacy students at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Selangor Puncak Alam Campus. The correlation between the preferred learning style of pharmacy students and their gender, year of study, and academic performance was also investigated in this study. Methods: Respondents (N = 258) were recruited using simple random sampling from four cohort of pharmacy students. The learning style was evaluated by using a validated Visual, Aural, Reading/writing, and Kinesthetic (VARK) Questionnaire. Results: In this study, unimodal learning style was preferred by 65.1% of the respondents, with the remaining 34.9% having multimodal style preference. Kinesthetic (K) was the most preferred learning style (37.6%) while Reading/writing (R) was the least preferred method of learning (33.7%). The Chi-square test of independence revealed that there was a significant correlation between gender and the preferred learning style (p = 0.002). However, no correlation was observed in the preferred modality according to the year of study (p = 0.877) and academic performance (p = 0.989). Conclusion: In conclusion, the majority of our pharmacy students were unimodal learners, with the kinesthetic learning style being the most common and reading/writing being the least preferred. Our pharmacy students have also been discovered to be multimodal learners, which may be an important consideration for educators utilising a mixed teaching technique to support various learning styles. © 2023 UPM Press. All rights reserved.
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
issn 16758544
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677578980556800