Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software

This study aimed to compare the 3D skull models reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images using three different open-source software with a commercial software as a reference. The commercial Mimics v17.0 software was used to reconstruct the 3D skull models from 58 subjects. Next, two open-s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
Main Author: Yap Abdullah J.; Manaf Abdullah A.; Zaim S.; Hadi H.; Husein A.; Ahmad Rajion Z.; Malin Abdullah J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications Ltd 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85177560863&doi=10.1177%2f09544119231212034&partnerID=40&md5=55d5bcdbce191e7d6b4f49a1efe2d297
id 2-s2.0-85177560863
spelling 2-s2.0-85177560863
Yap Abdullah J.; Manaf Abdullah A.; Zaim S.; Hadi H.; Husein A.; Ahmad Rajion Z.; Malin Abdullah J.
Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
2024
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
238
1
10.1177/09544119231212034
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85177560863&doi=10.1177%2f09544119231212034&partnerID=40&md5=55d5bcdbce191e7d6b4f49a1efe2d297
This study aimed to compare the 3D skull models reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images using three different open-source software with a commercial software as a reference. The commercial Mimics v17.0 software was used to reconstruct the 3D skull models from 58 subjects. Next, two open-source software, MITK Workbench 2016.11, 3D Slicer 4.8.1 and InVesalius 3.1 were used to reconstruct the 3D skull models from the same subjects. All four software went through similar steps in 3D reconstruction process. The 3D skull models from the commercial and open-source software were exported in standard tessellation language (STL) format into CloudCompare v2.8 software and superimposed for geometric analyses. Hausdorff distance (HD) analysis demonstrated the average points distance of Mimics versus MITK was 0.25 mm. Meanwhile, for Mimics versus 3D Slicer and Mimics versus InVesalius, there was almost no differences between the two superimposed 3D skull models with average points distance of 0.01 mm. Based on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) analysis, the similarity between Mimics versus MITK, Mimics versus 3D Slicer and Mimics versus InVesalius were 94.1, 98.8 and 98.3%, respectively. In conclusion, this study confirmed that the alternative open-source software, MITK, 3D Slicer and InVesalius gave comparable results in 3D reconstruction of skull models compared to the commercial gold standard Mimics software. This open-source software could possibly be used for pre-operative planning in cranio-maxillofacial cases and for patient management in the hospitals or institutions with limited budget. © IMechE 2023.
SAGE Publications Ltd
9544119
English
Article

author Yap Abdullah J.; Manaf Abdullah A.; Zaim S.; Hadi H.; Husein A.; Ahmad Rajion Z.; Malin Abdullah J.
spellingShingle Yap Abdullah J.; Manaf Abdullah A.; Zaim S.; Hadi H.; Husein A.; Ahmad Rajion Z.; Malin Abdullah J.
Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
author_facet Yap Abdullah J.; Manaf Abdullah A.; Zaim S.; Hadi H.; Husein A.; Ahmad Rajion Z.; Malin Abdullah J.
author_sort Yap Abdullah J.; Manaf Abdullah A.; Zaim S.; Hadi H.; Husein A.; Ahmad Rajion Z.; Malin Abdullah J.
title Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
title_short Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
title_full Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
title_fullStr Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
title_sort Three-dimensional analysis of reconstructed skulls using three different open-source software versus commercial software
publishDate 2024
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
container_volume 238
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1177/09544119231212034
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85177560863&doi=10.1177%2f09544119231212034&partnerID=40&md5=55d5bcdbce191e7d6b4f49a1efe2d297
description This study aimed to compare the 3D skull models reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images using three different open-source software with a commercial software as a reference. The commercial Mimics v17.0 software was used to reconstruct the 3D skull models from 58 subjects. Next, two open-source software, MITK Workbench 2016.11, 3D Slicer 4.8.1 and InVesalius 3.1 were used to reconstruct the 3D skull models from the same subjects. All four software went through similar steps in 3D reconstruction process. The 3D skull models from the commercial and open-source software were exported in standard tessellation language (STL) format into CloudCompare v2.8 software and superimposed for geometric analyses. Hausdorff distance (HD) analysis demonstrated the average points distance of Mimics versus MITK was 0.25 mm. Meanwhile, for Mimics versus 3D Slicer and Mimics versus InVesalius, there was almost no differences between the two superimposed 3D skull models with average points distance of 0.01 mm. Based on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) analysis, the similarity between Mimics versus MITK, Mimics versus 3D Slicer and Mimics versus InVesalius were 94.1, 98.8 and 98.3%, respectively. In conclusion, this study confirmed that the alternative open-source software, MITK, 3D Slicer and InVesalius gave comparable results in 3D reconstruction of skull models compared to the commercial gold standard Mimics software. This open-source software could possibly be used for pre-operative planning in cranio-maxillofacial cases and for patient management in the hospitals or institutions with limited budget. © IMechE 2023.
publisher SAGE Publications Ltd
issn 9544119
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677886469177344