Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review

Background: Definitive working impression of a complete denture requires proper border molding as part of impression techniques to capture the essential details of anatomical landmarks and the functional sulcus. In the era of digital dentistry, the digital impression using optical scanners may be an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open Dentistry Journal
Main Author: Mohamed N.; Yusof H.M.; Yacob N.; Hamid N.F.A.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Bentham Science Publishers 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85177466828&doi=10.2174%2f18742106-v17-230906-2023-8&partnerID=40&md5=598f63eb116027ac4a4e2a559b2f338a
id 2-s2.0-85177466828
spelling 2-s2.0-85177466828
Mohamed N.; Yusof H.M.; Yacob N.; Hamid N.F.A.
Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
2023
Open Dentistry Journal
17

10.2174/18742106-v17-230906-2023-8
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85177466828&doi=10.2174%2f18742106-v17-230906-2023-8&partnerID=40&md5=598f63eb116027ac4a4e2a559b2f338a
Background: Definitive working impression of a complete denture requires proper border molding as part of impression techniques to capture the essential details of anatomical landmarks and the functional sulcus. In the era of digital dentistry, the digital impression using optical scanners may be an alternative to conventional techniques. Objective: This paper discusses the differences between conventional methods and digital impression in a complete denture covering its procedures, importance and relevance of border molding in both methods for a good working impression. Methods: The study reviewed papers from 2000 to 2022 in Medline and PubMed on border molding and complete denture working impression. Both methods were revised and contrasted to discuss the relevance and advantages of both approaches. Results: It is still controversial to conclude that digital impression is superior to the conventional method. Both methods have the strength to improve the quality of the impression taking procedure and complete denture quality of retention and stability. Digital impression gives more comfort and less post insertion adjustment. The conventional method still has good clinical outcomes in terms of retention and stability. Border molding should not be disregarded as part of the working impression procedure. Conclusion: The paper concludes that border molding and the conventional working impression technique are still relevant due to their comparable outcome compared to digital impression, as less cost and high skills are involved. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher.
Bentham Science Publishers
18742106
English
Review
All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
author Mohamed N.; Yusof H.M.; Yacob N.; Hamid N.F.A.
spellingShingle Mohamed N.; Yusof H.M.; Yacob N.; Hamid N.F.A.
Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
author_facet Mohamed N.; Yusof H.M.; Yacob N.; Hamid N.F.A.
author_sort Mohamed N.; Yusof H.M.; Yacob N.; Hamid N.F.A.
title Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
title_short Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
title_full Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
title_fullStr Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
title_sort Conventional Border Molding versus Digital Impression on Complete Denture Impression: A Review
publishDate 2023
container_title Open Dentistry Journal
container_volume 17
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.2174/18742106-v17-230906-2023-8
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85177466828&doi=10.2174%2f18742106-v17-230906-2023-8&partnerID=40&md5=598f63eb116027ac4a4e2a559b2f338a
description Background: Definitive working impression of a complete denture requires proper border molding as part of impression techniques to capture the essential details of anatomical landmarks and the functional sulcus. In the era of digital dentistry, the digital impression using optical scanners may be an alternative to conventional techniques. Objective: This paper discusses the differences between conventional methods and digital impression in a complete denture covering its procedures, importance and relevance of border molding in both methods for a good working impression. Methods: The study reviewed papers from 2000 to 2022 in Medline and PubMed on border molding and complete denture working impression. Both methods were revised and contrasted to discuss the relevance and advantages of both approaches. Results: It is still controversial to conclude that digital impression is superior to the conventional method. Both methods have the strength to improve the quality of the impression taking procedure and complete denture quality of retention and stability. Digital impression gives more comfort and less post insertion adjustment. The conventional method still has good clinical outcomes in terms of retention and stability. Border molding should not be disregarded as part of the working impression procedure. Conclusion: The paper concludes that border molding and the conventional working impression technique are still relevant due to their comparable outcome compared to digital impression, as less cost and high skills are involved. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher.
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
issn 18742106
language English
format Review
accesstype All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677588110508032